Court dissent discusses scope of immunity for international organizations under U.S. law

Court dissent discusses scope of immunity for international organizations under U.S. law The passage merely analyzes statutory interpretation of immunity for foreign NGOs and multilateral banks, offering no concrete leads, names, transactions, or allegations of misconduct. It lacks novelty and does not implicate high‑ranking officials or controversial actions. Key insights: Justice Breyer dissents on the breadth of immunity for international organizations.; Interpretation hinges on whether the statute should be read statically or dynamically.; Reference to Atkinson v. Inter‑American Development Bank as precedent.