Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01355645Dept. of JusticeOther

EFTA Document EFTA01355645

• C) O 0 Z -0 -11 Page 36 OO mm z z r• > r- -o C A " 1 THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY*" Copyright © 2011 CourtLink Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -n o SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ?) (West Palm Beach) Doe No 5 v. Epstein cp PLAINTIFF: Jane Doe No 5 DEFENDANT: Epstein, Jeffrey AMICUS: United States of America WITNESS: Jean Luc Bruhnel Material DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:08cv80381 FILING DATE: 4/14/2008 JURISDICTION: Diversity JUDGE: Marra. Kenneth A

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01355645
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

• C) O 0 Z -0 -11 Page 36 OO mm z z r• > r- -o C A " 1 THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY*" Copyright © 2011 CourtLink Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -n o SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ?) (West Palm Beach) Doe No 5 v. Epstein cp PLAINTIFF: Jane Doe No 5 DEFENDANT: Epstein, Jeffrey AMICUS: United States of America WITNESS: Jean Luc Bruhnel Material DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:08cv80381 FILING DATE: 4/14/2008 JURISDICTION: Diversity JUDGE: Marra. Kenneth A

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
C) O 0 Z -0 -11 Page 36 OO mm z z r• > r- -o C A " 1 THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY*" Copyright © 2011 CourtLink Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -n o SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ?) (West Palm Beach) Doe No 5 v. Epstein cp PLAINTIFF: Jane Doe No 5 DEFENDANT: Epstein, Jeffrey AMICUS: United States of America WITNESS: Jean Luc Bruhnel Material DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:08cv80381 FILING DATE: 4/14/2008 JURISDICTION: Diversity JUDGE: Marra. Kenneth A NATURE OF SUIT: 360 Personal Injury FILING TYPE: Civil CAUSE: Diversity28 USC 1332 JURY DEMAND: Plaintiff STATUS: Case Closed PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY(S): Herman. Jeffrey Marc [COR LD NIG] Herman & Mermelstein 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL, USA 33160 z0 cp 0 • z 0 AI3R Research Profik Last z a 2 --JO 0 CO 0) 03 O3 10 modified 6' l21-2007 For internal use only EFTA01355645

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08CV80381

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

6p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

9p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Du..ument 511 Entered on FLSD Docku, J3/29/2010 Page 1 of 11

11p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.