Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01356949Dept. of JusticeOther

EFTA Document EFTA01356949

applicable), shall have the equivalent meaning under relevant Applicable Law. 3. CLASSIFICATION AND AUTHORISATION 3.1 WHERE REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW, DB HAS CATEGORISED CLIENT AS A PROFESSIONAL CLIENT OR ELIGIBLE COUNTERPARTY UNDER APPLICABLE LAW FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE PROVISION OF SERVICES PROVIDED UNDER THESE TOBS. DB has informed Client of its categorisation separately. 3.2 MiFID requires that clients be classified as either - retail client", -professional

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01356949
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

applicable), shall have the equivalent meaning under relevant Applicable Law. 3. CLASSIFICATION AND AUTHORISATION 3.1 WHERE REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW, DB HAS CATEGORISED CLIENT AS A PROFESSIONAL CLIENT OR ELIGIBLE COUNTERPARTY UNDER APPLICABLE LAW FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE PROVISION OF SERVICES PROVIDED UNDER THESE TOBS. DB has informed Client of its categorisation separately. 3.2 MiFID requires that clients be classified as either - retail client", -professional

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
applicable), shall have the equivalent meaning under relevant Applicable Law. 3. CLASSIFICATION AND AUTHORISATION 3.1 WHERE REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW, DB HAS CATEGORISED CLIENT AS A PROFESSIONAL CLIENT OR ELIGIBLE COUNTERPARTY UNDER APPLICABLE LAW FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE PROVISION OF SERVICES PROVIDED UNDER THESE TOBS. DB has informed Client of its categorisation separately. 3.2 MiFID requires that clients be classified as either - retail client", -professional client" (whether that is a -per se professional client", or, where the client elects to be treated as a professional client, an "elective professional client" ) or "eligible counterparty". 3.3 Where Client has been classified pursuant to requirements under Applicable Law, Client is responsible for notifying DB immediately if, at any point in time, Client considers that it does not meet the criteria to be categorised as a professional client (whether a per se professional client or an elective professional client) or an eligible counterparty, as appropriate. If a change of categorisation is required, Client consents to DB taking such action as it considers necessary in relation to such change, which may mean that DB cannot continue to provide Client with services pursuant to these Terms of Business. 3.4 In relation to business where Client is treated an eligible counterparty, clause 12 (Order Execution Policy), clause 13 (Order Handling), clauses 17.6, and 17.7 will not appl) to Client. 3.5 DBAG is authorised under German Banking Law (competent authority: ECB (contact address: Sonnemannstrasse 22, 60314 Frankfurt am Main) and the BaFin (contact address: Marie-Curie-Str. 24-28, 60439 Frankfurt am Main)) and, in the United Kingdom, by the PRA (contact address: 20 Moorgate, London, EC2R 6DA). It is subject to supervision by the ECB and by BaFin and is subject to limited regulation in the United Kingdom by the FCA (contact address: 25 The North Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London El4 5HS) and the PRA. Details about the extent of its authorisation and regulation by the PRA and regulation by the FCA are available upon request or from Imps:Huy:v. db.coi.n/djitlpsures, DBAG is a stock corporation incorporated in the Federal Republic of Germany. 3.6 DB will deal with Client on the basis that: (a) Client has the necessary experience, knowledge and expertise required to make its own investment decisions and properly assess the risks involved in any transaction it undertakes with DB or that DB undertakes on Client's behalf; and (b) (where Client is a per se professional client) Client is able financially to bear any related investment risks consistent with Client's investment objectives. 4. MONEY LAUNDERING LEGISLATION 4.1 To comply with legal and regulatory requirements, DB may require reasonable verification of Client's, or Client's employees', officers' or associates'. identity, which Client agrees to provide. DB may also request or obtain additional information including in relation to the ownership structure, (including the identity of the Client's beneficial owners) credit standing and business conduct of Client and Connected Persons of Client. 4123 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) CONFIDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0043188 SDNY_GM_00 189372 EFTA01356949

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01269322

ACCOUllt 1 ype:- &(\inlbNCLW Coo. t., Adds Name: IfWg &IOW 10:60.41dP king Meld SOWS , Ate3Ura AtNeifiatt. de Phst Swap laftarekta Shithei him/ Neg. tad pit nia led tea. ein.Q.c. • Uwe baler having DePosit Accomi Asittrge,:. the nr. ulcer Iliktriaz Sharing .id Pthavy PoEcy and the pecaza rocs and ft Number: I Sin. Reg, I Date: Prepared by: Authorized b SSN: ID Type: o: ID No: SSN: ID Type: 5.‘ CONFIDENTIAL SONY_GM_00013475 CONFIDENTIAL EFTA_001241 18 EFTA01269322

32p
OtherUnknown

'aunt NUM

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01269393

40p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

11 MAY 25-MAY 27 901_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Irons, Janet Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 11-29 AM To: Richard C. Smith Cc: Jeffrey T. We Subject: Meeting with Prison Society tomorrow Hello Warden Smith, I'm writing in preparation for our meeting with you and Director Hite tomorrow at 9:30 to talk about the Law Library. We have been in touch with Kim Kelmor, Assistant Director ofthe Law Library at Penn State, who has experience with prison libraries. She has helpfully provided us with some questions and guida

186p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01295845

NAME SEARCHED: Erika Kellerhals PWM BIS-RESEARCH performed due diligence research in accordance with the standards set by AML Compliance for your business. We completed thorough searches on your subject name(s) in the required databases and have attached the search results under the correct heading below. Significant negative media results may require escalation to senior business. Legal and Compliance management. Also, all accounts involving PEPs must be escalated. Search: Result: Click h

52p
Dept. of JusticeMay 26, 2015

Correctional Center RFP

Texas Department of Criminal Justice Brad Livingston Executive Director April 24, 2008 Re: Request for Proposals 696-PF-8-P030, Correctional Centers and/or Lockhart Work Program Facility Services Dear Prospective Offeror: Enclosed for your consideration is the above referenced solicitation for the operation and maintenance of Correctional Centers and/or Lockhart Work Program Facilities. When submitting proposals, please ensure all required information is included. Section of the soli

177p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.