Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01363299Dept. of JusticeOther

EFTA Document EFTA01363299

Page 9 91 F.3d 385, *; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 19807, **; 35 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1352 Finally, the district court's order is not immediately appealable [HN5] under the "collateral order" exception to the final judgment rule set forth in Cohen (**11] v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 546-47, 93 L. Ed. 1528, 69 S. Ct. 1221 (1949). Under Cohen, an interlocutory order is immediately appealable if, inter alia, the order would "be effectively unreviewable on appeal from a fin

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01363299
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Page 9 91 F.3d 385, *; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 19807, **; 35 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1352 Finally, the district court's order is not immediately appealable [HN5] under the "collateral order" exception to the final judgment rule set forth in Cohen (**11] v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 546-47, 93 L. Ed. 1528, 69 S. Ct. 1221 (1949). Under Cohen, an interlocutory order is immediately appealable if, inter alia, the order would "be effectively unreviewable on appeal from a fin

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Page 9 91 F.3d 385, *; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 19807, **; 35 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1352 Finally, the district court's order is not immediately appealable [HN5] under the "collateral order" exception to the final judgment rule set forth in Cohen (**11] v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 546-47, 93 L. Ed. 1528, 69 S. Ct. 1221 (1949). Under Cohen, an interlocutory order is immediately appealable if, inter alia, the order would "be effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment." Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay, 437 U.S. 463, 468, 57 L. Ed. 2d 351, 98 S. Ct. 2454 (1978). In the present case, we would not be foreclosed from reviewing the district court's denial of the Plaintiffs' motion to amend their complaint on an appeal from a final judgment. See Richardson p389] Greenshields Sec., Inc. v. Lau, 825 F.2d 647, 651 (2d Cir. 1987). Accordingly, the collateral order exception does not apply to this case. See DeNubilo, 343 F.2d at 456-57 (holding that the collateral order exception does not apply to an order denying a motion to amend a complaint). CONCLUSION In view of the foregoing, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. NATIONAL INDEPENDENT THEATRE EXHIBITORS, INC., Plaintiff, James T. Patterson, Sr., individually and d/b/a/ Screen Advertising Film Fund, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BUENA VISTA DISTRIBUTION COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Appellees No. 83-8638 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 748 F.2d 602; 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 15990; 1984-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P66,311; 40 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 954 December 12, 1984 PRIOR HISTORY: rii Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Screen Advertising Film Fund Corp. v. Buena Vista Distribution Co., 100 F.R.D. 14, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14570 (N.D. Ga., 1983) CASE SUMMARY: PROCEDURAL POSTURE: Plaintiffs, a corporation and its president, appealed the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, which granted summary judgment in favor of defendant distributors in plaintiffs' suit alleging For internal use only CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0053249 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00199433 EFTA01363299

Related Documents (6)

OtherUnknown

NAME SEARCHED: Richard Kahn

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01295897

94p
Dept. of JusticeMar 11, 2011

FBI Bruce E Ivins Investigation

010347Anthrax Page 1 of 1274 (Rev. 01-31-2003) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION o Precedence: To: From: ROUTINE Date: 02/01/2007 Washington Field Washington Field Squad AMX-1/~VRA Contact: SAl ~--~~--------------------------~ b6 Approved By: Drafted By: Case ID #: 279A-WF-222936 ~79A-WF-222936-BEI (Pending) .. {{t;1%l.O (Pending)-1 279A-WF-222936-BEI-FISUR (Pending) -/ Title: AMERITHRAX; MAJOR CASE 184 ....?,-;-~"$'- Synopsis: Opening of sub-files for the'--'.:9a'ptioned matter. D

1274p
OtherUnknown

Deutsche Asset

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01282367

9p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01441060

EFTA01441060 EFTA01441061 EFTA01441062 EFTA01441063 EFTA01441064 EFTA01441065 EFTA01441066 EFTA01441067 Deutsche Asset & Wealth Management Account Agreement 3. Epstein Virgin Islands Foundation, Inc Cllantls); 6100 Red Hook Quarter B3 U.S.V.I 00002 St. Thomas Account Title (Complete if different from the Client above) Account Number(s) IMPORTANT: PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN THIS ACCOUNT AGREEMENT . This is the account agreement (Account Agreement) between Client and Deutsche Bank

24p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01299150

NAME SEARCHED: Harry Beller PWM BIS-RESEARCH performed due diligence research in accordance with the standards set by AML Compliance for your business. We completed thorough searches on your subject name(s) in the required databases and have attached the search results under the correct heading below. Significant negative media results may require escalation to senior business. Legal and Compliance management. Also, all accounts involving PEPs must be escalated. Search: Result: Click here

35p
OtherUnknown

NAME SEARCHED: Harry Beller

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01299150

35p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.