EFTA Document EFTA01369373
From: Cherie Quigley Sent: 3/22/2017 11:23:37 AM To: Danya Friedman Kripa Aryal-Moore Subject: RE: URGENT - Immediate Response Requested - RE: Accoun JEFFREY EPSTEIN [I] Classification: For internal use only I spoke to Wayne He said that this client has already been to rep risk. We should just document the alert very clearly. Since this type of activity is normal for this client it is not deemed suspicious. The information provided appears consistent. Select for Delivery or view r
Summary
From: Cherie Quigley Sent: 3/22/2017 11:23:37 AM To: Danya Friedman Kripa Aryal-Moore Subject: RE: URGENT - Immediate Response Requested - RE: Accoun JEFFREY EPSTEIN [I] Classification: For internal use only I spoke to Wayne He said that this client has already been to rep risk. We should just document the alert very clearly. Since this type of activity is normal for this client it is not deemed suspicious. The information provided appears consistent. Select for Delivery or view r
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
httoithyww.jurgita.comRelated Documents (6)
EFTA Document EFTA01306406
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/05/2020 12:59 P?' NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1:2 INDEX NO. 159224/2016 RECEIVEDg e NYSCEF: 03/05/2020 Pa April 9, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK SHELDON BARR and THOMAS GARDNER, Plaintiffs, -against- CITY OF NEW YORK and 116 EAST 65TH STREET, LLC, Defendants, INDEX NO.: 159225/2010 535 Fifth Avenue New York, New York April 9, 2019 10:07 a.m. X X 1 EXAMINATION BEFORE TRIAL of the Defendant, 116 EAST 65TH STREET, LLC, by G
EFTA Document EFTA01481268
HAUL HOFFMAN PC P 002/013 MRR-06-2007(TUE) 16: 29 09/ ;23/ 20Er3 11,4: [it -344U- 114 -.4k1::-W? M.. 'WM. • FRS, • ARTICLES OF IN coittioRA JINN ciProVa MAR 2 9 NO1 OF JEEPERS, INC. FAGE 02(22 • ;..71 • * • _ ) j • 'P.17 C7'.- 71 r--,) We, the undersigned, for the purposes of associating to establish a corporffion for the transaction of the business and the promotion and conduct of the objects and purposes hereinafter stated, tinder thipirovisions ilia subject to the requir
EFTA Document EFTA01298346
DJ/amm IMF UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS OFFICE OF THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS AND TRADEMARKS 5049 Kongens Gale I 105 Ktng Street Charlotte Arno*. Virgin Islands 00802 Ch astiorstect Virgin Islam% 00820 Phone- Phone - Fox - Fox July 9, 2018 CERTIFICATION OF GOOD STANDING This is to certify that the non-profit corporation known as J. EPSTEIN VIRGIN ISLANDS FOUNDATION, INC. filed Articles of Incorporation in the Office of the Lieutenant Governor on JUNE 15, 2000
EFTA Document EFTA01377946
Page 10 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139535, * As for Epstein's non-privileged based objections, ["20] such as relevance, over breadth, over burdensomeness, and alleged HIPAA protection, said objections are also rejected. Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, allows any party to serve on any other party written interrogatories concerning matters within the scope of Federal Rule Civil Procedure 26(b). The scope of discovery under Rule 26(b) is broad: "[plarties may obtain discovery reg
EFTA Document EFTA01417308
Subject: RE: Southern Financial - Client Confirmation [C] From: Xavier Avila Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 18:04:47 To: Richard Kahn Paul Barrett Cc: Martin Zeman Liam Osullivan Davide-A Nina Tona Stewart Oldfield -0400 Richard, as discussed today, in order for the Southern Financial account in Global Markets can get KYCed and we can extend product adoptions to a couple of other asset classes (credit and equity OTC derivatives), we need you to confirm that the below information and the at
EFTA Document EFTA01377950
Page 14 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139535, * declines to compel a response to this request. See, e.g., World Triathlon Corp. v. SRS Sports Centre SDN, BHD, Case No. 8:04-cv-1594-T-24TBM, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15412, at *2 (M.D. Fla. July 29, 2005)("the court may limit discovery upon the determination that the discovery sought is unreasonably burdensome or expensive or the expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit, taking into account the needs of the case, the amount in co
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.