Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01371101Dept. of JusticeOther

EFTA Document EFTA01371101

31 October 2017 Railroads Canadian Rails bargaining partner for CNI and CP, while UNIFOR also provides representation for employees of CNI. Canadian rails have a history of going on strike and often tense relations with management - CP workers went on strike for roughly one day in 2015 and for nine days in 2012 before the Teamsters union and CP agreed to arbitration over longwithstanding issues such as pay and benefits, the pension plan, rest time for employees, etc. The Canadian gov't s

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01371101
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

31 October 2017 Railroads Canadian Rails bargaining partner for CNI and CP, while UNIFOR also provides representation for employees of CNI. Canadian rails have a history of going on strike and often tense relations with management - CP workers went on strike for roughly one day in 2015 and for nine days in 2012 before the Teamsters union and CP agreed to arbitration over longwithstanding issues such as pay and benefits, the pension plan, rest time for employees, etc. The Canadian gov't s

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
31 October 2017 Railroads Canadian Rails bargaining partner for CNI and CP, while UNIFOR also provides representation for employees of CNI. Canadian rails have a history of going on strike and often tense relations with management - CP workers went on strike for roughly one day in 2015 and for nine days in 2012 before the Teamsters union and CP agreed to arbitration over longwithstanding issues such as pay and benefits, the pension plan, rest time for employees, etc. The Canadian gov't stepped in with legislation to end the strike in 2012, and CNI narrowly avoided strikes in 2014 and 2015 after workers complained about the same issues as CP. Many of the changes brought about as part of Harrison's Precision Railroading plan at various railroads have led to tense relations between employees and mgmt. Fuel: Railroad fuel surcharge revenue is pegged to either WTI crude or on- highway diesel prices, meaning that when either of these two commodities hits a certain level, customers will be charged a different price under fuel surcharge revenue agreements. The mechanism is typically structured with a two month lag, meaning the surcharge mechanism is pegged to a commodity price from two months ago (for example, on July 1 the mechanism will be utilizing May 1 prices). Because of the lag a rising fuel price environment will be a temporary drag on profitability and vice versa. We view these trends as neutral over a mid/long-term basis. Rail End Markets Overview and Outlook While demand for U.S. and Canadian carloads generally comes from similar sources, the revenue contribution varies given the difference in geographical footprints. We note that U.S. rails have significantly higher exposure to Coal (14% of revenue in 2016) relative to the Canadian rails (6% of revenue). As one would expect, agricultural products represent a bigger piece of the pie for Canadians (21% of revenue) than it does for the U.S. rails (16% of revenue). Below we provide a side-by-side breakdown of revenue contribution for the U.S. rails (CSX, NSC, & UNP cumulatively) vs. the Canadian rails (CNI & CP cumulatively). [ Figure 39: U.S. rail revenue contribution 2016 (CSX, NSC. UNP) SOCITit DataCtie &Vt. COMCIPM MAI* Figure 40: Canadian rail revenue contribution 2016 (CNI CN Other 5% Sane Deteith• ark Centenalinel Intermodal Intermodal volumes represented roughly half of all North American rail traffic in 2016. It encompasses freight movements using more than one mode of transport, i.e. ship to truck, truck to train, train to truck, etc. with multiple moves over Deutsche Bank Securities Inc Page 23 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00210477 DB-SDNY-0064293 EFTA01371101

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeFeb 18, 2024

Garrison v. Sillivan & Cromwell — Complaint — U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. SULLIVAN & CROMWELL, LLP. Defendant. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL The difference between something that’s illegal and something that needs your advice and counsel to get corrected is usually pretty stark. Your job is to not miss the former and mistake it for the latter. —Ryne Miller, announcing h

106p
Dept. of JusticeNov 15, 2019

Iacobelli Plea Deal

Icase ECF No.58 Pagellof32_ United States District COurt Eastern District of Michigan Southern Division United States of'America, - . Case No. l7?or?20406 Honorable Paul Borman V. Offenses: Alphons Iaeobelli, A Count One: Conspiracy to Violate . . the Labor Management Relations Defendant. - . Act (18 U.S.C. 371) Count Seven: Subscribing 21 False Tax Return (26 U.S.C. 7206(1)) I Maximum Imprisonment: Count One: 5 years . Count Seven: 3 years Maximum?Fine: I Count One: $250,000 Count

32p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

1 May 1 1255-May 6 237_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins me: Sent Tn: Subject: Atladimem: LT. THOMAS E. ALLEN JR Thomas S. Allen. Jr. Sunday. May BIL EDIE 12:55 AM Allyson FL Dwell; Brenda McKin1e?c C. Kay Wandring: Caitlyn D. Neff: Daniel?le Minarch?lck: JeFFrey' T. Hite; Jon D. Fisher. Jonathan M. Mfl?n-der. Joseph 5. Kolenorluan Mendez: Kevin T. Jeirles; [any Lidgett Lee R. Shea??er: Lorinda L. Brown.- Matti-new T. Fishet: Melanie Gordan; Michael S. Woods Richard C. 5mm; Shephanie D. Calander?mtus Report SMDIE 20150501004

493p
Dept. of JusticeMar 11, 2011

FBI USAMRID Investigation

011621Anthrax Page 1 of 1446 o I 2792\-WF-222936-'-USAMRIID - \\OC o I [he followijg investigation was conducted by Special Agent (SA)_ _of the federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) on February 24, 2005: ? The United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) Keycard Access records from 1998 through 2002 were queried f r v' ? ? ? scientist nd visitin scient'st both ?rom the who have p eviously been identified as visiting USAMRIID circa May 1998. ;11 available

1446p
Dept. of JusticeDec 16, 2019

Iacobelli Plea Deal

Icase ECF No.58 Pagellof32_ United States District COurt Eastern District of Michigan Southern Division United States of'America, - . Case No. l7?or?20406 Honorable Paul Borman V. Offenses: Alphons Iaeobelli, A Count One: Conspiracy to Violate . . the Labor Management Relations Defendant. - . Act (18 U.S.C. 371) Count Seven: Subscribing 21 False Tax Return (26 U.S.C. 7206(1)) I Maximum Imprisonment: Count One: 5 years . Count Seven: 3 years Maximum?Fine: I Count One: $250,000 Count

32p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.