Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01382421Dept. of JusticeOther

EFTA Document EFTA01382421

Amendment No. 3 to Form S-1 Table of Contents AB ACQUISITION LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) With respect to the remainder of the leases the Company assigned to third parties, because of the wide dispersion among third parties and the variety of remedies available, the Company believes that if an assignee became insolvent, it would not have a material effect on the Company's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. No l

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01382421
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Amendment No. 3 to Form S-1 Table of Contents AB ACQUISITION LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) With respect to the remainder of the leases the Company assigned to third parties, because of the wide dispersion among third parties and the variety of remedies available, the Company believes that if an assignee became insolvent, it would not have a material effect on the Company's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. No l

Ask AI About This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Amendment No. 3 to Form S-1 Table of Contents AB ACQUISITION LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) With respect to the remainder of the leases the Company assigned to third parties, because of the wide dispersion among third parties and the variety of remedies available, the Company believes that if an assignee became insolvent, it would not have a material effect on the Company's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. No liability has been recorded for assigned leases in the Company's consolidated balance sheet related to these contingent obligations. The Company also provides guarantees, indemnifications and assurances to others in the ordinary course of its business. Legal Contingencies Various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of business, including suits charging violations of certain wage and hour or civil rights laws, are pending against the Company. Some of these suits purport or have been determined to be class actions and/or seek substantial damages. Any damages that may be awarded in antitrust cases will be automatically trebled. The Company continually evaluates its exposure to loss contingencies arising from pending or threatened litigation and believes it has made provisions where the loss contingency can be reasonably estimated and an adverse outcome is probable. Nonetheless, assessing and predicting the outcomes of these matters involves substantial uncertainties. Management currently believes that the aggregate range of reasonably possible loss for the Company's exposure in excess of amounts accrued is expected to be immaterial to the Company. It remains possible that despite management's current belief, material differences in actual outcomes or changes in management's evaluation or predictions could arise that could have a material effect on the Company's financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. Action against Haggen: Subsequent to the end of the Company's fiscal 2015 first quarter, on June 29, 2015, counsel for Haggen delivered a notice of claims to Albertson's LLC and Albertson's Holdings LLC asserting that those companies had committed fraud and breached the Asset Purchase Agreement under which Haggen purchased 146 divested stores by improperly transferring inventory out of purchased stores, overstocking and understocking inventory, failing to advertise in the ordinary course of business, misusing confidential information and failing to use commercially reasonable efforts to preserve existing relationships. Haggen made no specific monetary demands, but withheld payment of approximately 541.1 million due for purchased inventory at 38 stores on the basis of these allegations. On July 17, 2015, Albertson's LLC and Albertson's Holdings LLC commenced a lawsuit against Haggen in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, alleging claims for breach of contract and fraud arising out of Haggen's failure to pay the approximately 641.1 million due for the purchased inventory. On July 20, 2015. an essentially identical complaint was filed in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County. On August 26, 2015, the Company voluntarily dismissed the action it had commenced in Superior Court in Los Angeles County. On September 1, 2015, Haggen commenced a lawsuit against Albertson's LLC and Albertson's Holdings LLC in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. alleging claims for violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, attempted monopolization under the Sherman Act, breach of contract, indemnification, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, fraud, unfair competition, misappropriation of trade secrets under the Uniform Trade Secrets Acts, conversion and violation of the Washington Consumer Protection Act. In the complaint, Haggen alleged that the Company, among other actions set out in the complaint, misused Haggen's confidential information to draw customers away from Haggen stores, provided inaccurate, incomplete F-20 (Continued) hill). %kW wsce.go% A R: hi% es edgar data' 1646972 000119312515335826A900395dsla.htm110 14'2015 9:03:02 AM1 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. GRIM. P. 6(e) CONFIDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0081768 SDNY_GM_00227952 EFTA01382421

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Flight #AM1

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01363303

Page 16 748 F.2d 602, *; 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 15990, **; 1984-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P66,311; 40 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 954 [HN2] The prerequisites to a private cause of action under section 4 of the Clayton Act are well established: the plaintiff must show (1) a violation of the antitrust laws, in this case sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, (2) injury to its "business or property," and (3) a causal relationship between the antitrust violation and the injury. Nichols v. Mobile Board

1p
OtherUnknown

NAME SEARCHED: Richard Kahn

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01295897

94p
Dept. of JusticeMay 26, 2015

Correctional Center RFP

Texas Department of Criminal Justice Brad Livingston Executive Director April 24, 2008 Re: Request for Proposals 696-PF-8-P030, Correctional Centers and/or Lockhart Work Program Facility Services Dear Prospective Offeror: Enclosed for your consideration is the above referenced solicitation for the operation and maintenance of Correctional Centers and/or Lockhart Work Program Facilities. When submitting proposals, please ensure all required information is included. Section of the soli

177p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

1 May 1 1255-May 6 237_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins me: Sent Tn: Subject: Atladimem: LT. THOMAS E. ALLEN JR Thomas S. Allen. Jr. Sunday. May BIL EDIE 12:55 AM Allyson FL Dwell; Brenda McKin1e?c C. Kay Wandring: Caitlyn D. Neff: Daniel?le Minarch?lck: JeFFrey' T. Hite; Jon D. Fisher. Jonathan M. Mfl?n-der. Joseph 5. Kolenorluan Mendez: Kevin T. Jeirles; [any Lidgett Lee R. Shea??er: Lorinda L. Brown.- Matti-new T. Fishet: Melanie Gordan; Michael S. Woods Richard C. 5mm; Shephanie D. Calander?mtus Report SMDIE 20150501004

493p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01382310

Amendment No. 3 to Form S-1 Table of Contents issuing contingent value rights with an estimated fair value of $1.03 and $0.05 per share relating to Safeway's 49% interest in Casa Ley and deferred considerations related to Safeway's previous sale of the PDC assets, respectively, for an aggregate fair value of $270.9 million. At the time of the Safeway acquisition, Safeway operated 1,325 retail food stores under the banners Safeway, Vons, Tom Thumb, Pavilions, Randalls and Carrs located princ

1p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

17 August 16 through August 31 2016_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Juan Mendez Tuesday, August 16, 2016 1:10 AM Brenda A. McKinley; C. Kay Woodring; Caitlyn D. Neff; Danielle Minarchick; Eric A. Lockridge; Jeffrey T. Hite; Jonathan M. Millinder; Julie A. Simoni; Kevin T. Jeirles; Larry L. Lidgett; Lee R. Sheaffer; Lorinda L. Brown; Matthew T. Fisher; Melanie L. Gordon; Michael S. Woods; Richard C. Smith; Stephanie D. McGhee; Thomas S. Allen, Jr.; Walter E. Jeirles Calendar and Status Report 8/16/2016 20

1846p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.