RE: DB James Malcolm: Are the BoJ shifting stance? Own some cheap optionality (Vahe Stepanian, May 04, 2015)EFTA Document EFTA01383632
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Re: DB James Malcolm: Are the Bo.] shifting stance? Own some cheap optionality (May 01, 2015)
Title Matchefta-efta01383631
Case Filesd-10-EFTA01383631Dept. of JusticeRe: DB James Malcolm: Are the Bo.] shifting stance? Own some cheap optionality (May 01, 2015)
May 1, 20151p
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01383631Dept. of JusticeRe: DB James Malcolm: Are the Bo.] shifting stance? Own some cheap optionality (May 01, 2015)
Email
Classification: Confidential The reason why one would do the trade below is for its embedded leverage. While it requires upfront premium, there is no IA required besides it. A premium neutral risk reversal utilizes your capital as it requires Initial Amount under your Credit Support Annex terms. We will send risk reversals quotes when market reopens. Could you please clarify what expiries you would like to look at? From: jeffrey E. [mailtoleevacationOcimail.com] Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015
Date
May 1, 2015
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01383631
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading document viewer...
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,800+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, donor-supported, and independent. Donors see no ads.
Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.