Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01383631Dept. of JusticeOther

EFTA Document EFTA01383631

Classification: Confidential The reason why one would do the trade below is for its embedded leverage. While it requires upfront premium, there is no IA required besides it. A premium neutral risk reversal utilizes your capital as it requires Initial Amount under your Credit Support Annex terms. We will send risk reversals quotes when market reopens. Could you please clarify what expiries you would like to look at? From: jeffrey E. [mailtoleevacationOcimail.com] Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01383631
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Classification: Confidential The reason why one would do the trade below is for its embedded leverage. While it requires upfront premium, there is no IA required besides it. A premium neutral risk reversal utilizes your capital as it requires Initial Amount under your Credit Support Annex terms. We will send risk reversals quotes when market reopens. Could you please clarify what expiries you would like to look at? From: jeffrey E. [mailtoleevacationOcimail.com] Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Classification: Confidential The reason why one would do the trade below is for its embedded leverage. While it requires upfront premium, there is no IA required besides it. A premium neutral risk reversal utilizes your capital as it requires Initial Amount under your Credit Support Annex terms. We will send risk reversals quotes when market reopens. Could you please clarify what expiries you would like to look at? From: jeffrey E. [mailtoleevacationOcimail.com] Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 4:02 PM To: Daniel Sabba; Paul Morris Subject: Re: DB James Malcolm: Are the Bo.] shifting stance? Own some cheap optionality send me put and calls at different strikes and duration, why in the world would i put up any money if i can short puts? buyu calls .risk reversal. sorry On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Daniel Sabba < > wrote: Jeffrey — we wanted to share this note with you as it relates to what we perceive to be your macro views. James Malcolm is updating his view on the Bol - he thinks there is now material event risk for the July meeting which warrants some 3-month vol premium on Yen assets and a close following of domestic data and news in the interim. Is the BoJ stance shifting from "no-ease-unless-things-worsen" .... to "ease-unless-things improve" mode ? I think it makes a lot of sense to own some low delta, low premium $1PY upside at the moment We are axed to sell 50m$ payout of a 5th August expiry 133.15 One Touch at just 8% (mid 5%) So invest 4m$ upfront to make 50m$ if the level trades at any point during the lifetime of the trade Spot 119.95 Full piece attached below From James Malcolm : Minor tweaks or comments in recent BoJ reports suggest the central bank is becoming more nervous about missing its inflation target a little over two years after it was lifted and a radical new QE program to achieve it was implemented. They suggest that if the economy does not pick up substantial momentum over the next ten weeks additional easing may be warranted. The July 15 monetary policy meeting is key as it provides for an interim assessment of policy board member's price and growth forecasts, and comes just after the Bank's quarterly Tankan and public opinion survey. Beyond the hard data, these will show whether spending intentions and inflation expectations are lifting in response to higher profits and wages absent the consumption-tax drag. What has changed? This week's semiannual Outlook for Economic Activity and Prices report ('The Bank's View') replaced its assessment that "there are downside risks" for prices with the starker phrase that "risks are skewed to the downside." A research study on the impact of GE thus far, published today, concluded that "in order to achieve the price stability target of 2% in a stable manner, a further increase in inflation expectations is necessary." It also said that while CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0083381 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00229565 EFTA01383631

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainmailtoleevacationocimail.com

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01472973

Subject: DB James Malcolm: Are the BoJ shifting stance? Own some cheap optionality From: Daniel Sabba < Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 10:15:37 -0400 To: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@ mail.com> Cc: Paul Morris Vahe Stepanian Ariane Dwyer Richard Kahn Jeffrey — we wanted to share this note with you as it relates to what we perceive to be your macro views. James Malcolm is updating his view on the BoJ - he thinks there is now material event risk for the July meeting which warrants some 3-month vo

3p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01400975

Subject: FW: DB James Malcolm: Are the BoJ shifting stance? Own some cheap optionality [C] [I] From: Paul Morris ‹ > Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 11:32:38 -0400 To: Stewart Oldfield ‹ > Classification: For internal use only Paul Morris Managing Director Deutsche Bank Private Bank Office Cell: From: jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 10:08 AM To: Vahe Stepanian Cc: Paul Morris; Daniel Sabba; Ariane Dwyer; Richard Kahn Subject: Re: DB James Malcolm: Are

7p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01473027

Subject: april 2015 statements From: Richard Kahn ‹ > Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 16:14:31 -0400 To: Daniel Sabba Cc: Paul V Morris Vahe Stepanian Ariane Dwyer Jeanne Brennan i know we all have had conversations regarding keeping a closer eye on jeffrey's accounts yet i am unclear why i am first learning now may 7th when i review statements about the following: 1) Haze bond (peabody energy) was redeemed for 1,317,684 on 4/15/2015 2) SFL bond (headwaters inc) was redeemed for 1,038,130 on

5p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01410848

Subject: Re: DB James Malcolm: Are the BoJ shifting stance? Own some cheap optionality [I] From: Stewart Oldfield < › Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 16:10:42 -0400 To: Paul Morris <a> Classification: For Internal Use Only Risk reverals (collars) seem reasonable if he believes in the trade. Stewart Oldfield, CFA, CAIA Director Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas Deutsche Asset & Wealth Management 345 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10154 Tel: Mobile: blackberry Email: Securities offered thro

4p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01410866

Subject: RE: DB James Malcolm: Are the BoJ shifting stance? Own some cheap optionality [C] [I] From: Stewart Oldfield Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 14:55:09 -0400 To: Paul Morris ‹ > Classification: For internal use only Remarkably, Vahe actually copied me on that one From: Paul Morris Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 2:55 PM To: Stewart Oldfield Subject: FW: DB James Malcolm: Are the BoJ shifting stance? Own some cheap optionality [C] [I] Classification: For internal use only Paul Morris M

8p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01457319

From: Daniel Sabba Sent: 5/1/2015 10:15:37 AM To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation mail.comj CC: Paul Morris I I; Vahe Ste anian ; Ariane Dwyer Richard Kahn Subject: DB James Malcolm: Are the Bo., shifting stance? Own some cheap optionality Jeffrey — we wanted to share this note with you as it relates to what we perceive to be your macro views. James Malcolm is updating his view on the Sol - he thinks there is now material event risk for the July meeting which warrants some 3-month vol pr

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.