Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01384475Dept. of JusticeOther

EFTA Document EFTA01384475

18 September 2017 Long•Term Asset Return Study. The Next Financial Crisis allowed to build which gave policy makers more short-term flexibility but arguably left them more vulnerable to the whims of international capital flows over the medium to longer term. As we discussed in the main section, the EM crises of the late 1990s seemed to take global current account imbalances to the next level as those who suffered most in this period vowed to ensure they operated with surpluses from that

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01384475
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

18 September 2017 Long•Term Asset Return Study. The Next Financial Crisis allowed to build which gave policy makers more short-term flexibility but arguably left them more vulnerable to the whims of international capital flows over the medium to longer term. As we discussed in the main section, the EM crises of the late 1990s seemed to take global current account imbalances to the next level as those who suffered most in this period vowed to ensure they operated with surpluses from that

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
18 September 2017 Long•Term Asset Return Study. The Next Financial Crisis allowed to build which gave policy makers more short-term flexibility but arguably left them more vulnerable to the whims of international capital flows over the medium to longer term. As we discussed in the main section, the EM crises of the late 1990s seemed to take global current account imbalances to the next level as those who suffered most in this period vowed to ensure they operated with surpluses from that point on to protect themselves from a repeat of the extreme stresses of the period. As such Figure 52 and Figure 53 show that the last 20 years have seen these imbalances hit extreme levels. China's huge current account surplus (c.10% in 2007) was perhaps a contributor to the GFC (alongside all the other surplus countries) as their excess savings were largely channeled into safe US assets like US treasuries thus lowering global interest rates and leading to a huge global credit expansion. At the time, China didn't allow its currency to appreciate to correct the imbalances thus encouraging these excesses to continue for longer than they should have done. Although China's surplus has dramatically reduced post the GFC, it's not obvious from Figure 52 that overall global imbalances have reduced much since the crisis. Figure 54 shows the entirety of the globe's current account imbalances cumulatively (stacked) by groupings as a percentage of global GDP and shows that although the imbalances are off their 2006/2007 peaks, they remain elevated. So if current account imbalances were a contributor to unstable markets leading up to the GFC and the Euro Sovereign crisis in 2010- 2012 then they equally could be a cause today given that the overall numbers are similar. Figure 54: Global imbalances -- Current account balances (% of global GOP) - Legend ordered from largest surplus (DM Europe) to largest deficit (US) as of 2016 2.0% 1.6% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% -0.6% •1.0% -1.6% 2.0% • OM Europe ■ OM Asia tex•JP) • JP •Russia • CIS (es-Russia) • EM Europe ■ LATAM and Carribbean • ME and Africa • US • CN EM Asia iex-fiNi • Other DM 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 Source Onto*. int Mref041 It's clear from Figure 52 - Figure 54 that we live in a world where huge cross border flows are essential to fund the status quo. As such this surely makes the financial system more crisis prone as domestic policy makers have less control of their own economy. If sentiment changes in the global financial system, flows can reverse at the touch of a button and the current global landscape makes this more possible. Figure 55 shows today's current account position for all G20 countries (including EU27 countries) in our sample. 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Page 48 Deutsche Bank AG/London CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0084697 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00230881 EFTA01384475

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01451175

9 January 2014 EX Blueprint Thin end of the wedge Theme In: Trend no bitter end In 2007 we replicated a RBA study that claimed non- commercial "profit seekers" made money on their IMM positions at the expense of commercial "liquidity seekers". 3 The striking conclusion is that currency speculators generally know the correct direction of 05 currencies and investors can profit from knowing their positions (although these signals are less useful in practice since IMM data is lagged three d

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01494186

sr. . 'teed, For the Period 5/1/13 to 5/31/13 Contact your J.P. Morgan Team at one of the telephone numbers on the front of your statements or write us at J.P. Morgan, 500 Stanton Christiana Road. 11OP53, Newark. DE 19713-2107 as soon as you can. if you think your statement is wrong or if you need more information about a transfer on the statement. We must hear from you no later than 60 days alter we sent you the FIRST statement on which the error or problem appeared. (1) Tell us your name an

1p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p
OtherUnknown

Table of Contents

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01265841

45p
OtherUnknown

SUBS

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01307372

96p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01486178

sr. . 'teed, For the Period 12/1/13 to 12/31/13 Deposits in Foreign Branches are not insured by the FDIC or any other Agency of the Federal Government; amounts in such foreign accounts do not have the benefit of any domestic preference applicable to U.S Banks; certain Foreign accounts are considered reportable to the Internal Revenue Service on a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (TD F 90-22.1). Bank products and services are offered through JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("JPMCB") an

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.