Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01384678Dept. of JusticeOther

EFTA Document EFTA01384678

HUBUS133 Alpha Group Capital to increased governmental and self-regulatory scrutiny of the "hedge fund" industry in general. It is impossible to predict what, if any, future changes in regulation applicable to the Partnership, the Underlying Funds, the General Partner, the Management Company, the markets in which they trade and invest or the counterparts with which they do business may be instituted in the future. Any such regulation could have a material adverse impact on the profit potent

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01384678
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

HUBUS133 Alpha Group Capital to increased governmental and self-regulatory scrutiny of the "hedge fund" industry in general. It is impossible to predict what, if any, future changes in regulation applicable to the Partnership, the Underlying Funds, the General Partner, the Management Company, the markets in which they trade and invest or the counterparts with which they do business may be instituted in the future. Any such regulation could have a material adverse impact on the profit potent

Ask AI About This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
HUBUS133 Alpha Group Capital to increased governmental and self-regulatory scrutiny of the "hedge fund" industry in general. It is impossible to predict what, if any, future changes in regulation applicable to the Partnership, the Underlying Funds, the General Partner, the Management Company, the markets in which they trade and invest or the counterparts with which they do business may be instituted in the future. Any such regulation could have a material adverse impact on the profit potential of the Partnership, as well as require increased transparency as to the identity of the Limited Partners. Government Involvement in the Private Sector Government involvement in the private sector varies in degrees among the countries in which an Underlying Fund may invest. Such involvement may include government ownership, wage and price controls or imposition of trade barriers or other protectionist measures. Regulatory Actions From time to time, in the ordinary course of operations, certain of the Management Company's businesses are subject to regulatory inquiries, investigations and enforcement proceedings from U.S. and non-U.S. governmental agencies, regulatory bodies and securities commissions, which can be costly and occupy significant staff time and resources. Any such inquiry, investigation or enforcement proceeding could include civil or criminal proceedings resulting in a censure, fine, penalty and/or other sanction, including asset freezes, the issuance of a cease and desist order or the suspension or expulsion of an individual. Any such inquiry, investigation or enforcement proceeding could have a material adverse impact on the Partnership. Securities Law Compliance Risks The U.S. and non-U.S. laws and regulations governing trading in the securities markets (and governing investing in other kinds of markets) are often complex and difficult to interpret, implement and monitor, and are subject to re-interpretation, which could expose the Partnership, the General Partner and their respective affiliates to liability. (See "Litigation," below.) Litigation With regard to certain of an Underlying Fund's investments, the Management Company, the Partnership and/or the Underlying Fund may be plaintiffs or defendants in private civil proceedings. The expense of prosecuting claims, for which there is no guarantee of success, and/or the expense of defending against claims by third parties and paying any amounts pursuant to settlements or judgments would generally be borne by the Partnership and the Underlying Funds and would reduce net assets or may, pursuant to applicable law, require Partners to return to the Partnership distributed capital and earnings. In the ordinary course of business, the Partnership or an Underlying Fund will be subject to litigation from time to time as litigation is a material component of certain of its strategies. In addition, an Underlying Fund may accumulate substantial positions in the Securities of issuers that become involved in proxy contests or other litigation. As a result of such investments, an Underlying Fund could be named as a defendant in a lawsuit or regulatory action. The outcome of such proceedings, which may materially adversely affect the value of the Partnership, may be impossible to anticipate, and such proceedings may continue without resolution for long periods DOC ID- 10746057.132 - 107 - CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0085089 CONFIDENTIAL SONY GM_00231273 EFTA01384678

Related Documents (6)

OtherUnknown

NAME SEARCHED: Harry Beller

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01299150

35p
Dept. of JusticeApr 30, 2025

24-291_-_Incident_Report_-_Redacted

Cba #1 #2 #3 Agency Name ORI Case# Date / Time Reported Crime Incident(s) Crime Incident Crime Incident At Found Weapon / Tools Location of Incident Premise Type Case Status Invest ID# Case Disposition: Supervisor CODES: V- Victim (Denote V2, V3) WI = Witness IO = Involved Other RP = Reporting Person (if other than victim) Type: Code Name (Last, First, Middle) Victim of DOB Race Sex Crime # Home Address Home Phone Employer Name/Address Business Phone Type: Code Name (Last, First, Middle) Victim

9p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p
Dept. of JusticeJul 22, 2021

Deferred prosecution agreement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. FIRSTENERGY CORP., Defendant. CASE NO. ____________ JUDGE BLACK DEFERRED PROSECUTION AGREEMENT The United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Ohio (“USAO-SDOH” or “government”) and the Defendant, FirstEnergy Corp., by its undersigned representative and counsel, pursuant to the authority granted by the Board of Directors, agree as follows: 1. Criminal Information

49p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

11 MAY 25-MAY 27 901_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Irons, Janet Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 11-29 AM To: Richard C. Smith Cc: Jeffrey T. We Subject: Meeting with Prison Society tomorrow Hello Warden Smith, I'm writing in preparation for our meeting with you and Director Hite tomorrow at 9:30 to talk about the Law Library. We have been in touch with Kim Kelmor, Assistant Director ofthe Law Library at Penn State, who has experience with prison libraries. She has helpfully provided us with some questions and guida

186p
OtherUnknown

In the Matter of the Search of

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01301551

6p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.