Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01384686Dept. of JusticeOther

EFTA Document EFTA01384686

HUBUS133 Alpha Group Capital If the Management Company decides, based on the factors set forth above, to execute over- the-counter transactions on an agency basis through Electronic Communications Networks ("ECNs"), it will also consider the following factors when choosing to use one ECN over another: the ease of use; the flexibility of the ECN compared to other ECNs; and the level of care and attention that will be given to smaller orders. The Management Company maintains policies and proc

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01384686
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

HUBUS133 Alpha Group Capital If the Management Company decides, based on the factors set forth above, to execute over- the-counter transactions on an agency basis through Electronic Communications Networks ("ECNs"), it will also consider the following factors when choosing to use one ECN over another: the ease of use; the flexibility of the ECN compared to other ECNs; and the level of care and attention that will be given to smaller orders. The Management Company maintains policies and proc

Ask AI About This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
HUBUS133 Alpha Group Capital If the Management Company decides, based on the factors set forth above, to execute over- the-counter transactions on an agency basis through Electronic Communications Networks ("ECNs"), it will also consider the following factors when choosing to use one ECN over another: the ease of use; the flexibility of the ECN compared to other ECNs; and the level of care and attention that will be given to smaller orders. The Management Company maintains policies and procedures to review the quality of executions, including periodic reviews by its investment professionals. Soft Dollars From time to time, the Management Company may pay a broker-dealer commissions (or markups or markdowns with respect to certain types of riskless principal transactions) for effecting Underlying Fund transactions in excess of that which another broker-dealer might have charged for effecting the transaction in recognition of the value of the brokerage and research services provided by the broker-dealer. In certain cases, such arrangements, although all related to the Management Company's administration and investment management of an Underlying Fund, may fall outside of the safe harbor for fiduciaries' use of "soft dollar" services established by Section 28(e) of the Exchange Act ("Section 28(e)"); provided, in each case, that the Management Company believes that these arrangements are equitable and consistent with the objectives of such Underlying Fund. As of the date of this Memorandum, there are no arrangements whereby the Management Company has committed any of the Underlying Funds to pay a certain level of commissions (or markups or markdowns) in exchange for any "soft dollar" or other services from any broker dealer. In addition, the Third-Party Ventures in which the Partnership may participate, may make use of "soft dollar" services, and any additional transaction expenses incurred in order to obtain such services—unlike in the case of any "soft dollar" services obtained by the Management Company—would generally constitute incremental expenses to the Partnership. Such "soft dollar" services may also fall outside of the "safe harbor" provisions of Section 28(e). Each Limited Partner, as a condition of investing in the Partnership, consents to such "soft dollar" arrangements and, if applicable, to the Management Company consenting to such arrangements on behalf of the Partnership. Also, consistent with Section 28(e), research products or services obtained with "soft dollars" generated by an Underlying Fund may be used by the Management Company to service one or more Other Accounts, including Accounts that may not have paid for the soft dollar benefits. Although the Management Company currently has no arrangements whereby any of its Accounts are receiving soft dollar credits, if it obtains them in the future, the Management Company will not be required to seek to allocate soft dollar benefits to Accounts in proportion to the soft dollar credits the Accounts generate. Where a product or service obtained with soft dollars provides both research and non-research assistance to the Management Company (i.e., a "mixed use" item), the Management Company will make a good faith allocation of the cost which may be paid for with soft dollars. In making good faith allocations of costs between administrative benefits and research and brokerage services, a conflict of interest may exist by reason of the Management Company's allocation of the costs of such benefits and services between those that primarily benefit the Management Company and those that primarily benefit the Accounts. DOC m- 10746057.132 - 125 - CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0085107 CONFIDENTIAL SONY GM_00231291 EFTA01384686

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01480194

. J.P. Morgan Entity Resolution Form J.P.Morgan D. Brokerage 3. RESOLVED, that those persons denoted above are authorized in the name and on behalf of the Entity to execute a brokerage egreement with I.P. Morgan Securities LLC and any successors or assigns, to purchase on margin or obtervise and borrow (en a secured or unsecured bass) from, sell (including short sales in a rhyme account), and lend (on a secured or unsecured basis) to, and to otherwise enter into transactors of any kind wi

1p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01456306

(j) Subject to paragraph 10(k), neither party may claim any sum by way of consequential loss or damage in the event of a failure by the other party to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement. (k) (i) Subject to subparagraph (ii) below. if as a result of a Transaction terminating before its agreed Repurchase Date under paragraphs 10(b), I0(gXiii) or 10(hXiii), the non-Defaulting Party, in the case of paragraph 10(b). Buyer. in the case of paragraph I0(gXiii). or Seller, in the

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01367255

Amendment #4 Page 826 of 868 bible of Cement% 211 Credit risk Credit nsk is tre risk that a counter party we not meet as otegasons under a Martial instrument or customer contract eaong to a Inertial loss Tre Company is exposed to treat nsk from its operating adrvbeS (pnmanty trade receivades) and from its financing actintee, "'eluding deposes with Darin and linanCifil instnutgons Eolas sole customers ate ['wort° and Dssur. Under the bower Roches° Agreement, credit terms we 37 days. and rec

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01489108

J.PMorgan FINANCIAL TRUST COMPANY INC ACCT. For the Period 5/1/10 to 5/31/10 Foreign Exchange Contracts Summary NET CURRENCY EXPOSURE SUMMARY Value in Currency AUSTRALIA DOLLAR (0.01) CANADIAN DOLLAR 0.01 US DOLLAR (717,387.03) Foreign Exchange Contracts Detail Market Value Receivable Trade Date Currency Amount Contract Current Market Market Value Unrealized Settlement Dale Counter Currency Counter Amount Rate Forward Rate Payable GaINLoss Speculative AUSTRALIA DOLL

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01394143

GLDUS1 29 OF Enterpnses equity securities, or anyone else who otherwise qualifies as a Covered Person becomes subject to a disqualifying event. The Access Fund will be required to make representations to the Glendower GP that the Access Fund and anyone that is treated as a beneficial owner under Rule 506, has not been subject to a disqualifying event. To the extent that any of the foregoing persons is not able to make such representation, or becomes subject to a disqualifying event, the Gl

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.