Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01385481Dept. of JusticeOther

EFTA Document EFTA01385481

January 2018 HY Corporate Credit HY Multi Sector.Media. Cable & Satellite In addition to building out existing licenses, mobile operators may also have the opportunity to scoop up more spectrum in the coming years, particularly in the mid-to-high band frequencies. The FCC has previously explored auctioning off 150 MHz of 3.5 GHz although the process hasn't progressed and timing is unclear. The FCC has agreed to auction off various mmWave bands (>28 GHZ and higher). Most recently, Intelsa

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01385481
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

January 2018 HY Corporate Credit HY Multi Sector.Media. Cable & Satellite In addition to building out existing licenses, mobile operators may also have the opportunity to scoop up more spectrum in the coming years, particularly in the mid-to-high band frequencies. The FCC has previously explored auctioning off 150 MHz of 3.5 GHz although the process hasn't progressed and timing is unclear. The FCC has agreed to auction off various mmWave bands (>28 GHZ and higher). Most recently, Intelsa

Ask AI About This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
January 2018 HY Corporate Credit HY Multi Sector.Media. Cable & Satellite In addition to building out existing licenses, mobile operators may also have the opportunity to scoop up more spectrum in the coming years, particularly in the mid-to-high band frequencies. The FCC has previously explored auctioning off 150 MHz of 3.5 GHz although the process hasn't progressed and timing is unclear. The FCC has agreed to auction off various mmWave bands (>28 GHZ and higher). Most recently, Intelsat and Intel jointly responded to an FCC N0l seeking to offer a commercial solution to freeing up some of its valuable C- band spectrum 500 MHz of C-band (3.7-4.2 GHz), but FCC has yet to weigh in on the proposal or set out a path forward. As we can see, the focus on mid-to- high-band fits nicely with the carriers eyes set on 56 so we expect conversations around freeing up more of those frequencies to heat up throughout the year. Competitive Landscape: Since the last round of major M&A in the wireless industry back in 2013, which established the current 4-player national landscape we know today, the market has not only seen stiff competition, but a material shift in the way management teams have done business. T-Mobile's Un-carrier initiatives created device financing plans, altered funding options, and unleashed a slew of plan offerings that has pressured ARPUs for years. Sprint and T-Mobile positioned themselves in the market as the mobile companies with the best value, which opened up more GBs I $, and eventually led the Big-2 to offer Unlimited plans at price points below existing plans while also eliminating overages, which had a large impact especially in 1H17. While it has been a difficult few years across the industry, lately we've seen more rational behavior with respect to pricing. Sprint, who considers itself the "price leader" in the industry, implemented a price increase in CY3Q17 with the intent of raising prices again in corning quarters. Management has spoken of service revenue inflection in the back-end of 2018 so we expect Sprint's pricing to continue to improve from here. T-Mobile's pricing has been generally stable all year and any future pressure in coming quarters will likely come from contra-revenue items such as the recent Netflix add-on. We expect T-Mobile to remain disciplined in pricing as it seeks to achieve its FCF CAGR guidance of 45-48% over the next 3 years. After taking big hits early on in the Unlimted adoption and no overages phase, the Big-2 are moderating as well. Wireless CPI trends have been more of less stable since April 2017 so the carrier specific anecdotes and broader sentiments are being reflected in the macro data. The other sources of competition that are really coming into view now are the cable companies. Three of the four largest cable companies in the US now have some sort of agreements in place with a nationwide carrier to offer wireless services over their network. In our opinion, the most at risk are the Big-2 given their dominant market share in many geographies. The arrival of a competing service utilizing the same infrastructure could put new pressure on the likes of Verizon and AT&T, particularly since cable is primarily utilizing the quad-play bundle to extend the lifetime value of customers and reduce churn as opposed to chase profits. Still at the center of the discussion around the future of wireless is DISH Network. Another year goes by and DISH acquires more spectrum (low band auction in January 2017) but also still keeps its strategy around a 5G broadband network fairly mysterious. While we now know of their intention to build a narrowband loT network, even this is likely a temporary step along an evolutionary path to rolling out a true wireless 5G network of the future. Chatter from earlier in the year on potential partners for DISH are not worth repeating here. Our experience with the company over many years tells us that talk surrounding DISH is never spurred by the company itself as senior management is notoriously tight-lipped with everyone about anything strategic. When will we know more? Well, our best guess does lead us to the back half of 2018. With 5G standards progressing through 3GPP for both consumer as Page 208 In lust a few than years the focus of centers on spectrum has gone from low and mid band to mid and high band and ultra- high band frequent Not too long ago Sprint's 26 GHz spectrum was considered commercially challenged now it is in a sweet spot Verizon end AT&T have been dragged into the world of truly unlimited data and are re-pridng their existing base of ARPU: The industry has seemingly taken a pause In terms of Its competitive intendw, bringing about more rational behavior with respect to pridng. It remains to be seen whether abS's entry Into wireless wail allow It to truly grow revenue (offense) or simply Mt lower chum In the bundle (defense). Either way, cable seems to be here to stay DISH all feeb threat* of a mystery, with much of its forum plans all shrouded In secrecy. We do that let the beck half of 2018 k a sensible timeline around whkt we might see more concrete for around DISH', plans for the Mum &Its wirekes broadband SG network Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) CONFIDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0086767 SDNY_GM_00232951 EFTA01385481

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreflected

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

20 Sent May through August 2016 _Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Richard C. Smith Thursday, September 01, 2016 9:20 AM Amy Rumbel; Brenda A. McKinley; Danielle Minarchick; Denise L. Elbell; Eileen B. Mckinney; Ellen Struble; Faith Ryan; Gene Lauri; Gene Lauri; Harvery Haack; Jennifer Crane; Peg Dobrinska; Peter Shull; Richard C. Smith; Sara Mays; Tom Young; Wendy Vinhage FW: Life Skills Meeting 8.24.16 Reentry Life Skills Subcommittee Meeting Notes.docx Life Skills Committee: Please find attached not

1370p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

17 August 1 through August 15 2016_Redacted.pdf

JAN 1 2 3 4 7a to 12p 0 4 0 7 1p to 5p 1 3 0 5 6p to 12a 2 0 1 10 1a to 6a 0 0 0 0 AVER 1 2 0 6 total  3 7 1 22 Year to date searches 5 7 12 9 4 8 32 6 26 8 3 2 10 39 7 18 7 8 0 8 33 763 8 18 5 3 2 7 28 9 4 4 0 0 2 8 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 12 3 1 0 4 16 12 13 16 23 20 17 3 2 0 7 10 12 39 49 Jan 14 15 16 17 11 20 4 1 19 15 3 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 11 2 1 33 42 7 5 Month Average 18 7 9 1 0 4 17 19 20 21 9 22 14 11 16 9 9 2 1 0 0 4 7 10 7 29 40 28 190.75 22 14 13 1 0 7 28 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 0

1793p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

1 May 1 1255-May 6 237_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins me: Sent Tn: Subject: Atladimem: LT. THOMAS E. ALLEN JR Thomas S. Allen. Jr. Sunday. May BIL EDIE 12:55 AM Allyson FL Dwell; Brenda McKin1e?c C. Kay Wandring: Caitlyn D. Neff: Daniel?le Minarch?lck: JeFFrey' T. Hite; Jon D. Fisher. Jonathan M. Mfl?n-der. Joseph 5. Kolenorluan Mendez: Kevin T. Jeirles; [any Lidgett Lee R. Shea??er: Lorinda L. Brown.- Matti-new T. Fishet: Melanie Gordan; Michael S. Woods Richard C. 5mm; Shephanie D. Calander?mtus Report SMDIE 20150501004

493p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

17 August 16 through August 31 2016_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Juan Mendez Tuesday, August 16, 2016 1:10 AM Brenda A. McKinley; C. Kay Woodring; Caitlyn D. Neff; Danielle Minarchick; Eric A. Lockridge; Jeffrey T. Hite; Jonathan M. Millinder; Julie A. Simoni; Kevin T. Jeirles; Larry L. Lidgett; Lee R. Sheaffer; Lorinda L. Brown; Matthew T. Fisher; Melanie L. Gordon; Michael S. Woods; Richard C. Smith; Stephanie D. McGhee; Thomas S. Allen, Jr.; Walter E. Jeirles Calendar and Status Report 8/16/2016 20

1846p
OtherUnknown

*UBS

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01273824

191p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.