Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01385949Dept. of JusticeOther

EFTA Document EFTA01385949

27 March 2015 US Fixed Income Weekly The view in enOrtgeirje credit Existing home sales skimmed under forecasts on Monday (+1.2% instead of +1.7%) while new home sales jumped that threshold Tuesday (+7.8% instead of -3.5%). The FHFA home price index came in Tuesday up YoY by 5.48%. Housing continued to deliver mixed signals. although generally showing modest growth and decelerating home price appreciation. Adding up to fair value in 62/FN With the first month of MIP-induced prepayments

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01385949
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

27 March 2015 US Fixed Income Weekly The view in enOrtgeirje credit Existing home sales skimmed under forecasts on Monday (+1.2% instead of +1.7%) while new home sales jumped that threshold Tuesday (+7.8% instead of -3.5%). The FHFA home price index came in Tuesday up YoY by 5.48%. Housing continued to deliver mixed signals. although generally showing modest growth and decelerating home price appreciation. Adding up to fair value in 62/FN With the first month of MIP-induced prepayments

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
27 March 2015 US Fixed Income Weekly The view in enOrtgeirje credit Existing home sales skimmed under forecasts on Monday (+1.2% instead of +1.7%) while new home sales jumped that threshold Tuesday (+7.8% instead of -3.5%). The FHFA home price index came in Tuesday up YoY by 5.48%. Housing continued to deliver mixed signals. although generally showing modest growth and decelerating home price appreciation. Adding up to fair value in 62/FN With the first month of MIP-induced prepayments behind us and agency MBS prices showing some signs of stability post the March FOMC meeting, now presents a fine time to revisit relative value in agency pass-throughs. Sticking to our fair value formula (first detailed in our special report from January 27, 2015), we find that at current levels: GN2/FN 4.5% looks quite rich and we recommend shorting, even though it is negative carry (-1/32 per month) GN2/FN 4.0% looks modestly rich, and being short is slight positive carry (<1/32 per month) Research Analyst Research Analyst [Figure 6.. Framework for evaluating fair value in Ginnie Mae II/Fannie Mae swaps Cpn FNCL Px OAS OAD Incremental value (discount) of Pay Delay Liquidity Credit Prepayment Total G2/FN Fll G2/FN Act Act- F1/ Net Cony 2.50 98.314 17 6.78 0-007 -0.114 0-281 0-161 1-016 0-300 -0-036 0-030 3.00 102-07 4 6 5.4 0-006 -0-062 0-232 0086 0-264 0-234 -0-030 0-015 3.50 104-305 -3 4.14 0-007 -0056 0-165 -0075 0-040 0-034 -0-004 0-014 4.00 106-250 -6 2.69 0-006 -0-014 0-083 -1-015 -0-261 -0-150 0-111 -0-005 4.50 108-185 27 3.37 0-007 -0-022 0-117 -2-034 -1-251 -0-030 1-221 0-012 503 111-010 10 2.95 0-007 -0-080 0091 -1-160 -1.140 -1-160 -0-020 0-001 Nen al I ArS • IbteriN as of COB 312115 Method:log 0snIncl briar Cm assterin meal nom* ratios Spin Deux,* Sint Fair value framework To estimate fair value, we separate and price out the component risks (pay delay, liquidity, credit and prepayment) and then adjust the FN value to the corresponding GN2 fair value (Figure 6). We begin by running the FNCL at its market price in the DB prepay model to obtain an OAS. To calculate pay delay, we then alter the FNCL in the model to pay P&I five days sooner, matching G2SF, and price at constant OAS. For the liquidity premium FNCL carries over G2SF, we assume current GD/FN swap prices. For value of full faith and credit premium, we tighten the initial FNCL OAS by the interpolated agency debenture spread over Treasuries and then re-price in the same model (Tight OAS Price - Mkt Price = Credit value). Finally, to calculate the prepayment differential, we price FNCL at even OAS but have the prepay model treat the FNCL as G2SF. Here the model assumes an FHANA split of 70/30% (based on historical percentage) and assigns corresponding upfront and annual MIPs to FNCL based on WALA. We can then sum the individual components to arrive at the fair value difference between G2 and FN, which we compare to actual GN2/FN swaps. The biggest discrepancies lie in the 4.0 and 4.5% coupon where GN2 appears overvalued by 11/32s and 1-22/32s, respectively. We note however that hedge adjusted carry for the 62/FN 4.5% short is slightly negative, but is marginally positive for the G2/FN 4.0% short. Page 36 Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0087417 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00233601 EFTA01385949

Related Documents (6)

OtherUnknown

KYC Print

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01345276

1p
OtherUnknown

Table of Contents

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01265841

45p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01492909

For the Period 3/1/12 to 3/31/12 Account Summary Account Number Beginning Net Market Value Ending Net Change Start on Market Value In Value Page Investment Account(s) FINANCIAL TRUST COMPANY INC FINANCIAL TRUST COMPANY INC Total Value 14235800011 242ooese2 72,908,029.38 299,902.70 S73.207,932.08 72,476,344.98 (431,684.40) 300,899.71 997.01 972.777244.69 ($430,697.39) ThIs account summary is provided for informational purposes and includes assets at different entities. (

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01367345

31 May 2015 Integrated Oil US Integrated Oils Incentivizing the US producer As mentioned previously, the 500 Mb/d call on US onshore growth in 2017 will begin to ramp in the 21116. We estimate that as early as late 2016 -350 Mb/d of US onshore crude production will be needed vs. 1016 production levels. Assuming the need for an incremental 350 Mb/d of YoY growth in US Lower 48 oil production starting in the 211 of 2016 there is a clear need for WTI price to incentivize incremental activi

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01383215

From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: fyi Stewart Oldfield 11/21/2018 10:09:07 AM Bradley Gitlin I FW: MR/ LR remediation - your portfolio 2018_11_13_ACO_Stewart Oldfield.pdf; 2018_11_13_ACO_Stewart Oldfield_Remediation_Portfolio.xlsx From: Corinna-A Reibchen Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 7:25 PM To: Stewart Oldfield < Subject: MR / IR remediation - your portfolio Dear Stewart, > My name is Corinna Reibchen. I am the CEO of passcon LLC, a consulting firm specialized in KYC for

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.