Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01389051Dept. of JusticeOther

EFTA Document EFTA01389051

is in 1.‘t. Adelante Capital Management Real Estate (REITs) Glossary As of 3Q 2016 Alpha -Alpha measures the difference between a portfolio's actual returns and its expected performance, given its level of risk as measured by beta. A positive Alpha figure indicates the portfolio has performed better than its beta would predict. In contrast, a negative Alpha indicates the portfolio has underperformed, given the expectations established by beta.Alpha is calculated by taking the excess aver

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01389051
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

is in 1.‘t. Adelante Capital Management Real Estate (REITs) Glossary As of 3Q 2016 Alpha -Alpha measures the difference between a portfolio's actual returns and its expected performance, given its level of risk as measured by beta. A positive Alpha figure indicates the portfolio has performed better than its beta would predict. In contrast, a negative Alpha indicates the portfolio has underperformed, given the expectations established by beta.Alpha is calculated by taking the excess aver

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
is in 1.‘t. Adelante Capital Management Real Estate (REITs) Glossary As of 3Q 2016 Alpha -Alpha measures the difference between a portfolio's actual returns and its expected performance, given its level of risk as measured by beta. A positive Alpha figure indicates the portfolio has performed better than its beta would predict. In contrast, a negative Alpha indicates the portfolio has underperformed, given the expectations established by beta.Alpha is calculated by taking the excess average monthly return of the investment over the risk free rate and subtracting beta times the excess average monthly return of the benchmark over the risk free rate. Beta - Beta measures the sensitivity of the fund's excess return (total return minus the risk-free return) with respect to the benchmark's excess return that results from their systematic co- movement. It is the ratio of what the excess return of the fund would be to the excess return of the benchmark if there were no fund-specific sources of return. If beta is greater than one, movements in value of the fund that are associated with movements in the value of the benchmark tend to be amplified. If beta is one, they tend to be the same. and if beta is less than one, they tend to be dampened. If such movements tend to be in opposite directions, beta is negative. Beta is measured as the slope of the regression of the excess return on the fund as the dependent variable and the excess return on the benchmark as the independent variable. The beta of the market is 1.00 by definition. Morningstar calculates beta by comparing a portfolio's excess return over T-bills to the benchmark's excess return over so a beta of 1.10 shows that the portfolio has performed 10% better than its benchmark in up markets and 10% worse in down markets. assuming all other factors remain constant. Conversely, a beta of 0.85 indicates that the portfolio's excess return is expected to perform 15% worse than the benchmark's excess retum during up markets and 15% better during down markets. Excess Return - This is a measure of an investments return in excess of a benchmark. R2 - R-Squred reflects the percentage of a portfolio's movements that can be explained by movements in its benchmark Std Dev - Standard Deviation is a statistical measurement of dispersion about an average, which, for a mutual fund, depicts how widely the returns vaned over a certain period of time. Investors use the standard deviation of historical performance to try to predict the range of returns that are most likely for a given fund. When a fund has a high standard deviation, the predicted range of performance is wide, implying greater volatility. Standard deviation is most appropriate for measuring risk if it is for a fund that is an investors only holding. The figure can not be combined for more than one fund because the standard deviation for a portfolio of multiple funds is a function of not only the individual standard deviations, but also of the degree of correlation among the funds' returns. Morningstar computes standard deviation using the trailing monthly total returns for the appropriate time period. All of the monthly standard deviations are then annualized. Sharpe Ratio - A risk-adjusted return measure that measures excess return relative to a risk-free rate of return. It is calculated by dividing the manager's excess return (relative to cash or Treasury Bills) by its Standard Deviation. which measures the volatility of returns. or risk. Therefore. the Sharpe Ratio is a measure of return per unit of total risk. Sortino Ratio - Similar to the Sharpe Ratio, the Sortino Ratio is a risk-adjusted return measure that measures excess return relative to a risk-free rate of return, but is only concerned with downside risk. It is calculated by dividing the manager's excess return (relative to cash or Treasury Bills) by its Downside Deviation. In other words, it measures the return per unit of downside risk. Information Ratio - Measures the risk-adjusted excess return relative to a benchmark. It is calculated by dividing the managers excess return (relative to the benchmark) by its tracking error. By utilizing Tracking Error instead of Standard Deviation in the calculation, IR effectively eliminates market nsk and isolates only the risk taken from active management. In other words, IR shows how a manager performed per unit of active risk taken. Therefore, IR can be viewed as a measure of efficiency or skill, as managers with higher IR's are more efficient (skillful) in producing excess returns per unit of risk taken. Deutsche Daft Wealth Management These documents are for use in ono-omone client presentations. Page 4 of 5 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0093248 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00239432 EFTA01389051

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01355819

rBY SIGNING BELOW, CLIENT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT CLIENT HAS RECEIVE0, READ AND AGREES TO THE TERMS OF THIS MARGIN AGREEMENT, INCLUDING THE MARGIN DISCLOSURE. This Agreement is subject to the Pre-Dispute Arbitration Clause in Sechonfil, page 5, of the Account Agreement. N i( f it%Sg Account Number Individual or joint account OF THIS IS A roiel ACCOUNT. ALL ACCOUNT OWNERS MUST SIGNY Signature Date Print Narro SSWEIN Signature Ogle Pnnt Name SSNIEIN Signature Date Print Name SS

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01448701

BY SIGNING BELOW, CLIENT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT CLIENT HAS RECEIVED, READ. AND AGREES TO THE TERMS OF THIS MARGIN AGREEMENT, INCLUDING THE MARGIN DISCLOSURE. This Agreement is subject to the Pre-Dispute Arbitration Clause in Section III, page 4, of the Account Agreement. Account Number Individual or joint account (IF THIS IS A JOINT ACCOUNT, ALL ACCOUNT OWNERS MUST SIGN): BffetNeniiiS analala Signature Date Print Name SSN/EIN Signature Date Print Name SSN/EIN Corporation, partnership

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01299130

KYC Print Page 1 of' 19 DB PWM GLOBAL KYC/NCA: PART A Int KYC Case # : 01141308 One sheet must be established per relationship - list all accounts included in the relationship 1. Relationship Details Relationship Name: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY RELATIONSHIP:00000483290 Booking Center: New York Relationship Manager: Paul Moms Relationship to PWM: 17 New PWM Relationship F Existing PWM Relationship If existing, please indicate since when the relationship exists, provide reason for new profi

19p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p
OtherUnknown

KYC Print

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01294896

12p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01329726

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION - MIKE MONRON EY AERONAUTICAL CENTER AIRCRAFT REGISTRATION APPLICATION 1) LerE0 STATES RECISTRA1 ION N 722JE RORER a 1 iredesal C TYPE CO REGSTRATICH 0 I POWS'0*/ 0 a cans (3 4 CO- are (CTRS eV tat) 0 5 OsOnTO1 0 7 UTSKI USW COTO* (US) 0 a Wan* Colsatcw 0 a Ncnasin Capwas Copse, 2) AIRCRAFT VANSACRER ANO IVOR.IL KEYSTONE HELICOPTER S.76C N ARCRAFT SERIAL WARIER 5) NAVE(S) OF APR iCAM

64p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.