Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01452585Dept. of JusticeOther

EFTA Document EFTA01452585

28 January 2014 Brokers, Asset Managers & Exchanges Alternative Asset Manager Initiation Figures 18 and 19 compare our estimates vs. Consensus, with Figure 18 shown on an ENI per unit basis, and Figure 19 shown on a distribution per unit basis (comparable to dividend per share forecasts, as Consensus DE forecasts are not readily available with a sizeable population). The Figures show our estimates for ENI are generally below Consensus, while our distribution forecasts are generally above

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01452585
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

28 January 2014 Brokers, Asset Managers & Exchanges Alternative Asset Manager Initiation Figures 18 and 19 compare our estimates vs. Consensus, with Figure 18 shown on an ENI per unit basis, and Figure 19 shown on a distribution per unit basis (comparable to dividend per share forecasts, as Consensus DE forecasts are not readily available with a sizeable population). The Figures show our estimates for ENI are generally below Consensus, while our distribution forecasts are generally above

Ask AI About This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
28 January 2014 Brokers, Asset Managers & Exchanges Alternative Asset Manager Initiation Figures 18 and 19 compare our estimates vs. Consensus, with Figure 18 shown on an ENI per unit basis, and Figure 19 shown on a distribution per unit basis (comparable to dividend per share forecasts, as Consensus DE forecasts are not readily available with a sizeable population). The Figures show our estimates for ENI are generally below Consensus, while our distribution forecasts are generally above Consensus. This above-Consensus view on distributions forms our more optimistic view on the Alt space - to the extent we are correct, and we think upside surprises in distributable earnings over the coming quarters will be a positive catalyst for valuation improvement. [Figure IS: DB Forecasts for ENI per unit for the Alts vs. Consensus 400Y2013 2014 2016 Alts DB Cons. %diff DB Cons. %diff APO $0.82 $0.80 1.9% $2.50 53.04 -17.7% BX 30.84 5082 2.3% $3.09 $2.98 3.7% CG $0.93 $0.87 6.8% $2.70 33.17 -14.8% KKR $0.96 $0.89 8.4% 52.33 $2.52 -7.5% OAK 31.19 $1.15 3.6% $4.36 $4.80 -9.2% Median 3.6% -9.2% Sono Thomson Aaron &be O*.eselx Ban 'Figure 19: DB Forecasts for Distribution per unit for the Alts vs. Consensus 40CY2013 2014 Alts DB Cons. %diff C8 Cons. %diff APO $0.80 30.79 1.4% 33.06 $2.48 23.3% BX $0.47 50.45 3.7% $1.95 $1.78 9.3% CG $1.20 $1.17 2.8% $2.22 $2.03 9.3% KKR $0.39 30.39 -0.5% 31.58 $1.44 10.0% OAK $0.91 50.92 -0.8% $3.78 $3.75 0.9% Median 1.4% 9.3% Saga ?Mown Arian neewtm Sort Our valuation methodology While valuation methodologies using sum of the parts or DCF models can be intellectually rigorous, we think a more simplified PIE approach on distributable earnings (DE) will end up being a better indicator of the Ails' unit price performance over time. Our approach works in the following steps: Observe each of the Alts forward P/E on Consensus (ENI) over the past 12 months and last two years and compare to the S&P 500 to derive a relative PIE; Assess to what extent each Alts' relative PIE will improve or worsen (or stay the same) over the next 12 months vs. the prior I2-months, based on the variety of fundamental factors outlined in this report; Derive a target forward P/E for the S&P 500 12 months from now, which is 14.9x (based on DB equity strategy forecast for S&P 2015 EPS of $125 and S&P ending prices of 1850 yearend 2014 and 2000 yearend 2015. which implies 1863 12-months from this report); Multiply our target relative PIE to derive a target absolute PIE; Apply this absolute P/E on our 2015 DE forecasts to derive where the units will trade on 1-year forward distributable earnings 12-months from now; hence where the units will trade on 2015 DE in Jan-2015. DB Cons. %diff $2.32 $3.08 -24.8% 53.24 $3.42 -5.4% $2.89 $3.41 -15.2% $2.33 $2.77 -15.8% $4.67 $4.83 -3.4% .15.2% 2016 DB Cons. %diff $2.56 $2.13 20.3% $2.46 $2.00 22.8% $2.70 $2.35 15.1% 51.76 $1.43 23.1% $3.98 $3.79 5.1% 20.3% Page 20 Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0109706 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00255890 EFTA01452585

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01394297

GLDUS129 OF Enterpnses (h) Full Contribution. The Investor understands that, except as otherwise provided in the Partnership Agreement, the Investor may not make less than the full amount of any required capital contribution in respect of such Investor's Interest, unless this Agreement is for any reason rejected or this offering is for any reason canceled, and that default provisions with respect thereto, pursuant to which thc Investor may suffer substantial adverse consequences (including

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01299130

KYC Print Page 1 of' 19 DB PWM GLOBAL KYC/NCA: PART A Int KYC Case # : 01141308 One sheet must be established per relationship - list all accounts included in the relationship 1. Relationship Details Relationship Name: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY RELATIONSHIP:00000483290 Booking Center: New York Relationship Manager: Paul Moms Relationship to PWM: 17 New PWM Relationship F Existing PWM Relationship If existing, please indicate since when the relationship exists, provide reason for new profi

19p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01452958

2 March 2014 Wireless Equipment Signals to Noise (S2N) beta of 1.4, and an equity risk premium of 5%. Our growth rate is based on a long-term estimate of industry growth, consistent with F5's specialty communications equipment peer group. Key downside risks to our price target are around unanticipated shifts in enterprise and carrier IT spending, technology disruptions in the ADC space, and F5's competitors (e.g. Citrix, Radware, A10, etc) taking share in key ADC use cases such as Web 2.

1p
OtherUnknown

FIFTH THIRD BANK

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01280935

2p
OtherUnknown

FIFTH THIRD BANK

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01280705

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.