Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01457188Dept. of JusticeOther

EFTA Document EFTA01457188

27 March 2015 US Fixed Income Weekly The Front End The front end is all about the timing and speed of lift off. Speed will probably be more important than even timing in that the market twill easily absorb a one and done Fed. Speed can also backfire in that if risk assets behave poorly for any given speed, the Fe won't be making their terminal rate in one swoop. An intra tightening period of stable Funds would allow for a sharp re-rally in short rates at some stage (Note 5s typically con

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01457188
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

27 March 2015 US Fixed Income Weekly The Front End The front end is all about the timing and speed of lift off. Speed will probably be more important than even timing in that the market twill easily absorb a one and done Fed. Speed can also backfire in that if risk assets behave poorly for any given speed, the Fe won't be making their terminal rate in one swoop. An intra tightening period of stable Funds would allow for a sharp re-rally in short rates at some stage (Note 5s typically con

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
27 March 2015 US Fixed Income Weekly The Front End The front end is all about the timing and speed of lift off. Speed will probably be more important than even timing in that the market twill easily absorb a one and done Fed. Speed can also backfire in that if risk assets behave poorly for any given speed, the Fe won't be making their terminal rate in one swoop. An intra tightening period of stable Funds would allow for a sharp re-rally in short rates at some stage (Note 5s typically converge to Funds at the end of a tightening cycle, so any sense that the fed would initiate a pause for several quarters would allow substantial spread convergence in our view). We remain of the view that this Fed does not want to commit the type 2 error and will be hard pressed to even begin raising rats in 2015. The bar is low for them to delay in that if the payroll report is all they have to go on, a soft patch in jobs could easily prompt ongoing delay. Using private final demand the long run output gap has barely improved since the crisis. One has to go the other extreme, to measure the gap from 2009 to argue that the gap has in fact closed. Either way the link with inflation has become tenuous. [Output gap since 1960 15 10 S I-I • -I •-• ...... • Ul CO •-• 'e P. O in 1.O O1 P4 cri 1O ID 1.O CO CO CO CO O1 g m OW. CP O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 output gap since 1960 00 N. 0 en g 8 g 8 0 0 Sane 1W Woonberg fewer IP inze Doteschr 'Output gap on trend since 2009 2.5 2 1.5 1.5 1 0.5 0 -0.5 0.5 • I. CPI yoy -1 -output gap since 2009q1 1.5 P.444 c? <1. 4* 1) evt* 41. ebb. ;I* gist 61. oS 6S, t o% t% t% % 1 IF A 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1§) 1? Seran• aff, 813Crntrerg leave (Pro , Gnu,* arst In terms of wage inflation below we update our wage model to incorporate the Fed's new NAIRU estimates. If unemployment does not continue to fall, there is still no wage acceleration. If it does then with the lower NAIRU estimates wage acceleration is still delayed until late 2015 - all consistent with a Fed struggling to raise rates. Unemployment Model In order to understand the relationship between wage acceleration and unemployment, we first project the year-over-year change in the growth rate of the average hourly earnings of production and nonsupervisory workers (ARE) on two variables. The first is a dummy variable that equals one if the unemployment rate is less than the CBO's estimate of the NAIRU, and equals zero otherwise, and the second is the year-over-year change in the unemployment rate. The thought experiment is that wage inflation should be affected by whether there is slack in the labor market and by the trajectory of job growth. As shown in the chart below, the above-discussed variables are able to explain a fair amount of the variation in wage acceleration: the R- squared of the regression is 33°k. Page 10 Deutsche Sank Securities Inc. CONFIDENTIAL — PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0116614 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00262798 EFTA01457188

Related Documents (6)

OtherUnknown

Deutsche Bank

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01343907

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01447597

Forwarded by Nav Gupta/db/dbcom on 10/07/2014 17:08 From: vinit To: jeevacation@gmail.com, Cc: Paul Morris/c Nav Gupta Date: 09/07/2014 14:41 Subject: Re: Jeffrey - can we have a quick chat this am ? [C] classification: confidential Hi Jeffrey - looping in Nay and Paul. To recap: we will find a few funds, which we think have best performance characteristic and best fees for u. Loan Funds better than single loans as u don't need to bother booking single loans and servicing them. If

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01279955

OMB Approval No. 2502-0265 Good Faith Estimate (GFE) Name of Originator Fifth Third Joann Brown Mortgage Company Borrower Originator 5001 Kingsley DR Address HD: 1MOCHQ Cincinnati, OH 45227 Propcny Address Ori nator Phone Number Originator Email Date of GFE October 03, 2014 Purpose Shopping for your loan This GFE gives you an estimate of your settlement charges and loan terms if you are approved for this loan. For more information, see HUD's Special Information Booklet on seu

3p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01365905

KYC Print Page 10 of 13 DB PWM GLOBAL KYC/NCA: US/LatAm/Int'I PART B elabonship Name SOUTHERN FINANCIAL RELATIONSHIP oking Center F NY F NY/Offshore F Offshore IF.skNIGIerate F High Risk Yoonsun Chung (Compliance signature) F DB Employee F DB Managed PIC F DB is Trustee/Co-Trustee F Bearer Shares 4. Attachments A. Type of Photo ID Provided F Drivers License F Passport F National/State ID F Other Checklist of names (individuals and/or entities) that were submitted for database B.

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01299130

KYC Print Page 1 of' 19 DB PWM GLOBAL KYC/NCA: PART A Int KYC Case # : 01141308 One sheet must be established per relationship - list all accounts included in the relationship 1. Relationship Details Relationship Name: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY RELATIONSHIP:00000483290 Booking Center: New York Relationship Manager: Paul Moms Relationship to PWM: 17 New PWM Relationship F Existing PWM Relationship If existing, please indicate since when the relationship exists, provide reason for new profi

19p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.