1 duplicate copy in the archive
RE: DB James Malcolm: Are the BoJ shifting stance? Own some cheap optionality (Daniel Sabba, 5/1/2015)
Title Matchefta-efta01457326
Case Filesd-10-EFTA01457326Dept. of JusticeRE: DB James Malcolm: Are the BoJ shifting stance? Own some cheap optionality (Daniel Sabba, 5/1/2015)
May 1, 20151p
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01457326Dept. of JusticeRE: DB James Malcolm: Are the BoJ shifting stance? Own some cheap optionality (Daniel Sabba, 5/1/2015)
Email
From: Daniel Sabba Sent: 5/1/2015 4:35:20 PM To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation • mail com Paul Morris CC: Vahe Ste anian I I; Ariane Dwyer ; Richard Kahn Subject: RE: DB James Malcolm: Are the BoJ shifting stance? Own some cheap optionality (Cl Classification: Confidential The reason why one would do the trade below is for its embedded leverage. While it requires upfront premium, there is no IA required besides it. A premium neutral risk reversal utilizes your capital as it requires In
Date
May 1, 2015
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01457326
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading document viewer...
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,800+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, donor-supported, and independent. Donors see no ads.
Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.