Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
sd-10-EFTA01459057Dept. of JusticeOther

EFTA Document EFTA01459057

Deutsche Bank Markets Research North America United States US Equity Insights 2016 S&P EPS growth to surge to 5%! Falling standards of excellence this cycle. Is there an objective passing grade? We reduce 2016E S&P EPS from $128 to $125. We're unsure of the tone of language appropriate to describe this reduction. Slashing or even cutting is too harsh as our new estimate is merely 2.5% lower. This trimming shouldn't surprise investors given recent commodity and currency markets. So is $

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
sd-10-EFTA01459057
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Deutsche Bank Markets Research North America United States US Equity Insights 2016 S&P EPS growth to surge to 5%! Falling standards of excellence this cycle. Is there an objective passing grade? We reduce 2016E S&P EPS from $128 to $125. We're unsure of the tone of language appropriate to describe this reduction. Slashing or even cutting is too harsh as our new estimate is merely 2.5% lower. This trimming shouldn't surprise investors given recent commodity and currency markets. So is $

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Deutsche Bank Markets Research North America United States US Equity Insights 2016 S&P EPS growth to surge to 5%! Falling standards of excellence this cycle. Is there an objective passing grade? We reduce 2016E S&P EPS from $128 to $125. We're unsure of the tone of language appropriate to describe this reduction. Slashing or even cutting is too harsh as our new estimate is merely 2.5% lower. This trimming shouldn't surprise investors given recent commodity and currency markets. So is $125 good S&P EPS in 2016? Is it bullish or bearish? It's only 5% growth, subnormal mid-cycle real EPS growth, but 10x better than 2015. Thus, S&P EPS growth is set to surge in 2016! But is there an objectively healthy S&P EPS growth rate? In this note we present our new 2016E S&P EPS and we explain why a healthy S&P EPS growth rate is the nominal cost of equity less the dividend yield. 2016 S&P EPS :Alt trorn $128 to $125 on stronger dollur lower oil ossurnptions We have long cautioned that every 10% appreciation in the dollar vs. mature currencies drags on S&P EPS growth by 2.5%. Every dime the Euro declines vs. USD hits S&P EPS by $1. Every $5/bbl oil price decline hits S&P EPS by $1, net of small benefits outside of Energy, Industrial Capital Goods & Materials; which all suffer. Airlines, Consumer Staples & Discretionary firms benefit from lower oil prices, but most of the cost savings is passed forward to customers. We lower our average 2016 Euro assumption from about $1.10 to $1.05. We raise our 2016 avg. DXY assumption from about 95 to 100. We lower our 2016 avg. oil price assumption from $60/bbl to $55/bbl and natural gas to $2.75. We also tempered our growth assumptions at US Retailers, Housing and Banks. 2015 did not have healthy underlying revenue or EPS growth ex oil and dollar S&P sales and operating EPS growth was broadly weak in 2015. Weakness extended beyond commodity producers and FX drags at multinationals. A surge in airline profits masked a significant Industrial Cap Goods profit decline. Revenue was flat at Financials with EPS growth from less litigation than 2014. No growth at Consumer Staples despite lower input costs. Good growth at Retailers, but disappointing given the macro tailwinds owing to fierce price competition. Strong at auto, but home builders disappointed. The strongest growth was at Health Care and consumer oriented Tech firms. Corporate tech spending on equip. and software remains very sluggish and chip makers were flattish on earnings given slow PC, handset and weak industrial end markets. Ex. Energy, Financials, HC and AAPL. AMZN & GOOG 2015 S&P EPS growth is -2.5%; this is the underlying trend with -4% FX drag that should fall to -1.5%. Stronger revenue growth is key to achieving healthy S&P EPS growth in 2016 Strong revenue growth at Health Care, better capex on productivity enhancers like tech equip/software, slower but still strong revenue growth at consumer oriented big cap Tech are key to our 4% S&P sales growth, 1% share shrink and flat net margin estimates for 2016. Some cyclically risky sectors like Auto, Airlines, Chemicals & Semiconductors must avoid losing any earnings power. Margin expansion is possible but upside counterbalanced by downside risk Fierce price competition at Retailers, more global competition at Industrials and the political threats at Health Care pose some sales risk, but mostly margin risk. There is also tax rate risk. Many are concerned about wage preqm ire on margins, but this is not a major risk for S&P firms. However, a tighter than expected labor market could lead to more Fed hikes than expected and thus EPS risks via dollar, oil or PE risk via credit market or a Tsy yield jump. Fed hikes are a small boost to S&P EPS. delineates healthy from unhealthy S&P EPS growth and supports an Our 1 year target of 18x trailing S&P EPS uses a 5.5% real and 7.5% nominal CoE. EPS is retained, so real EPS g must = real CoE - div yld to justify a PE = 1/real CoE. 20 November 2015 David Bianco Jo Wang Sisal kit &m ist Winn's' Tim Strategist :).., ',re, k',.. lam,:::.? Price 2089.17 Next 5%+ move Balanced Risk 2014 2015E Yearend Target 2058.90 2050. 2100 EPS $118 $119 Target PIE 17.4x 17.4x Current P/E 17.7x 17.6x 0PS $38.30 $41 2016E 2250- 2300 $125 18.2x 16.7x $44 'Related recent research 0,11,1 S&P should finish the year In 16 Nov 2015 black, but more red ahead for Energy Amazing margins, but mind the 8 Nov 2015 GAAP A structural slowing of 1 Nov 2015 Industrials: Investing around this late cycle risk Don't pull the plug on Health 23 Oct 2015 Care VS Entail( Strategy Baskets High Foreign Cash (Repatriation Beneliciaries) Big-Cap Reasonable PE Tech Challenged Industrial Capital Goods US Domestic Strength elejenillbee ckerg DBUSHIFC DBUSBRTE DBUSCICG DBUS0MST Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. Deutsche Bank does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. Thus, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. DISCLOSURES AND ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS ARE LOCATED IN APPENDIX 1. MCI (P) 124/04/2015. CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) CONFIDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0119270 SDNY_GM_00265454 EFTA01459057

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

SWIFT/BICDBUSBRTE
SWIFT/BICDBUSCICG
SWIFT/BICDBUSHIFC

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeMay 26, 2015

Correctional Center RFP

Texas Department of Criminal Justice Brad Livingston Executive Director April 24, 2008 Re: Request for Proposals 696-PF-8-P030, Correctional Centers and/or Lockhart Work Program Facility Services Dear Prospective Offeror: Enclosed for your consideration is the above referenced solicitation for the operation and maintenance of Correctional Centers and/or Lockhart Work Program Facilities. When submitting proposals, please ensure all required information is included. Section of the soli

177p
OtherUnknown

NAME SEARCHED: Mort, Inc

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01295633

135p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01476303

Deutsche Bank Markets Research North America United States Periodical US Equity Insights 2016 S&P EPS growth to surge to 5%! Falling standards of excellence this cycle: Is there an objective passing grade? We reduce 2016E S&P EPS from $128 to $125. We're unsure of the tone of language appropriate to describe this reduction. Slashing or even cutting is too harsh as our new estimate is merely 2.5% lower. This trimming shouldn't surprise investors given recent commodity and currency ma

252p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01405372

NAME SEARCHED: 3. Epstein & Co PWM BIS-RESEARCH performed due diligence research in accordance with the standards set by AML Compliance for your business We completed thorough searches on your subject name(s) in the required databases and have attached the search results under the correct heading below. Significant negative media results may require escalation to senior business, Legal and Compliance management. Also, all accounts involving PEPs must be escalated. Search: Result: RDC

48p
OtherUnknown

`Oral

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01329414

310p
Dept. of JusticeFeb 18, 2024

Garrison v. Sillivan & Cromwell — Complaint — U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. SULLIVAN & CROMWELL, LLP. Defendant. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL The difference between something that’s illegal and something that needs your advice and counsel to get corrected is usually pretty stark. Your job is to not miss the former and mistake it for the latter. —Ryne Miller, announcing h

106p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.