According to DOJ-released documents indexed by Epstein Exposed, Mr. Schoeman appears in 1 case document in the Epstein files.
Mentioned in 13 documents. Roles: witness being deposed, witness, person informed by Ms. Trzaskoma, likely an attorney or representative involved in the case, involved in responding to judge's questions about jury consultants
Large reports can take 10 to 30 seconds. Your download will start automatically.
Mr. Schoeman is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
This dossier was generated by AI (Claude) from court filings, government releases, and other documentary sources in our database. It may contain errors or misattributions. Always verify claims against the linked source documents.
Background
Mr. Schoeman is a lawyer at Kramer Levin and a former Assistant U.S. Attorney. He represented Raymond Craig Brubaker in the trial of David Parse, working alongside his partner Barry Berke at Kramer Levin. Schoeman had a personal friendship with Theresa Trzaskoma, the lawyer representing David Parse in the same trial.
Schoeman was deposed and testified extensively regarding his investigation into Juror No. 1, identified as Catherine Conrad, during the David Parse trial. The central issue in his testimony concerned whether Juror No. 1 was connected to a disbarred or suspended attorney who shared the same name. Schoeman discussed this concern with Ms. Trzaskoma, who assured him it was not the same person based on the voir dire process.
Schoeman's depositions and testimony appear in documents filed in connection with case 1:20-cv-03038-PAE, which are part of court-unsealed and oversight document collections. Many of the additional documents in which he is referenced appear to be financial or investment-related records (EFTA documents) whose specific connection to Schoeman is not established in the available evidence.
Epstein Connection
Mr. Schoeman's direct connection to Jeffrey Epstein is not established in the provided evidence. His name appears across documents housed in Epstein-related case file collections (court-unsealed, house-oversight, DOJ, and EFTA datasets), but the substantive documents referencing him concern his role as a witness and attorney in the David Parse trial, specifically regarding the investigation into Juror No. 1 (Catherine Conrad). The nature of why these documents appear within the Epstein case file collections is not explained by the available evidence.
Key Allegations(5)
Schoeman was informed by Ms. Trzaskoma about a concern that Juror No. 1 shared a name with a disbarred or suspended attorney, but did not pursue follow-up investigation
documentedSchoeman confirmed he did not ask follow-up questions about Trzaskoma's initial concern regarding Juror No. 1's potential connection to a suspended attorney
documentedSchoeman stated he did not receive certain information from Theresa Trzaskoma and was uncertain about what he would have done if he had received it
documentedSchoeman agreed that sharing a middle initial with another person of the same name makes it statistically more likely they are the same person, but expressed uncertainty about whether more information would have helped his analysis of Juror No. 1's identity
documentedMs. Trzaskoma informed Mr. Schoeman and Mr. Berke about the Juror No. 1 suspension issue on May 12th
documentedLegal Status
Mr. Schoeman appeared as a deponent and witness in proceedings related to the David Parse trial, specifically regarding the investigation into Juror No. 1 (Catherine Conrad). He was subject to direct examination, cross-examination, and redirect examination.
Notable Statements(3)
“”
“”
“”
Contradictions(2)
Schoeman and Trzaskoma concluded Juror No. 1 was not the same person as the disbarred attorney based on the voir dire process
Schoeman later agreed that sharing a middle initial makes it statistically more likely two people with the same name are the same person, and expressed uncertainty about whether more information would have helped his analysis, suggesting the initial conclusion may have been made on insufficient grounds
Key Relationships(4)
Schoeman had a personal friendship with Theresa Trzaskoma, the lawyer representing David Parse, and discussed the Juror No. 1 concern with her (d-8413, d-8414, d-8415, d-8416)
Schoeman investigated and testified about Juror No. 1, Catherine Conrad, and whether she was connected to a disbarred/suspended attorney (d-8412, d-8417, d-8418)
Brune testified in the same proceedings and confirmed that Trzaskoma informed Schoeman and Berke about the juror issue (d-8343)
Schoeman was involved in the trial of David Parse as counsel for co-defendant Raymond Craig Brubaker (d-8412, d-8413)
Timeline(5 events)
A note from Juror No. 1 (Catherine Conrad) was read aloud by the Court during the David Parse trial; Schoeman was questioned about this note
Ms. Trzaskoma informed Mr. Schoeman and Mr. Berke about the Juror No. 1 suspension issue
Schoeman had a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma during jury deliberations regarding the concern that Juror No. 1 shared a name with a disbarred lawyer; Trzaskoma assured him it was not the same person
Schoeman was deposed regarding his investigation into Juror No. 1 and his conversations with Trzaskoma, undergoing direct examination, cross-examination, and redirect
Deposition transcript filed as Document 616-1 in case 1:20-cv-03038-PAE
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
1 source for document mentions
Mr. Schoeman testifies that he didn't know if more information would have helped his analysis of Jur...
“Mr. Schoeman testifies that he didn't know if more information would have helped his analysis of Jur”
External Cross-Check
Search ICIJ Offshore Leaks, OFAC Sanctions, SEC EDGAR, and Federal Courts
Document Mentions
This dossier on Mr. Schoeman was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.