deposition transcript: A-5808
The witness confirms having a conversation with Susan Brune about what to include in a brief and acknowledges deciding to omit certain information. The witness expresses regret over the omission and suggests they would handle it differently in hindsight.
Summary
The witness confirms having a conversation with Susan Brune about what to include in a brief and acknowledges deciding to omit certain information. The witness expresses regret over the omission and suggests they would handle it differently in hindsight.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (1)
Related Documents (6)
court transcript: 6168/20
The transcript captures a court hearing where the prosecutor, Ms. Davis, argues that the defense made a strategic decision not to disclose information about a juror, and that this decision cannot form the basis of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. The government also presents evidence of the defendant's involvement in the alleged crimes, highlighting his role in orchestrating complex transactions.
court transcript: A-5788
The witness testifies that they discussed a Westlaw report with their partner Randy Kim, but did not discuss it with Susan Brune or Theresa Trzaskoma. The witness also states they did not see certain email exchanges until after a court conference.
Index of Examination: A-5838
This document is an index of examinations conducted during a court proceeding, listing witnesses and the attorneys who questioned them. It includes the names of witnesses Susan Brune, Laura Edelstein, Paul Schoeman, and Barry H. Berke, as well as attorneys Ms. Davis, Mr. Shechtman, and Mr. Okula. The document was prepared by Southern District Reporters, P.C.
EFTA02686169
court transcript: A-5919
The document appears to be a court transcript where the speaker is arguing that the defense counsel's decision not to disclose certain information about a juror was a deliberate strategy, and therefore, not ineffective assistance of counsel. The speaker references evidence and testimony that supports their claim. The discussion centers around the defense counsel's actions during voir dire and subsequent investigation regarding Juror No. 1.
EFTA02420041
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.