Index of Examination: A-5838
This document is an index of examinations conducted during a court proceeding, listing witnesses and the attorneys who questioned them. It includes the names of witnesses Susan Brune, Laura Edelstein, Paul Schoeman, and Barry H. Berke, as well as attorneys Ms. Davis, Mr. Shechtman, and Mr. Okula. The document was prepared by Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Summary
This document is an index of examinations conducted during a court proceeding, listing witnesses and the attorneys who questioned them. It includes the names of witnesses Susan Brune, Laura Edelstein, Paul Schoeman, and Barry H. Berke, as well as attorneys Ms. Davis, Mr. Shechtman, and Mr. Okula. The document was prepared by Southern District Reporters, P.C.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (5)
Related Documents (6)
Court Transcript: A-5815
The prosecution rests its case after moving Government Exhibit 10 into evidence without objection. The defense then calls its first witness, Paul Schoeman, to testify.
Court Transcript: 6152/20
The prosecution rests its case after submitting Government Exhibit 10 into evidence without objection. The defense then calls its first witness, Paul Schoeman, to testify.
court transcript: A-5779
The transcript shows the court excusing a witness, Ms. Brune, and then proceeding with the testimony of Laura Edelstein, who is being questioned by government lawyer Mr. Okula about a lawyer's obligations regarding jury misconduct.
deposition: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 616-301 Filed 02/24/22 Page 93 of 117
The document is a transcript of the direct examination of Barry H. Berke, a partner at Kramer, Levin, Naftalis & Frankel, who testified as a witness for defendant Parse. Berke provided details about his employment history and legal career. The testimony was given in a courtroom in the Southern District of New York.
transcript of a court hearing or deposition: A-5920
The document discusses the defense's decision not to disclose information about a juror during voir dire or after an investigation, and the government's argument that this was a tactical choice that cannot form the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel. The defense considered several alternatives but chose to do nothing. The government's view is that this conscious and deliberate choice was a strategic decision.
deposition: A-5819
Schoeman testifies about a conversation with Trzaskoma that occurred during jury deliberations, after a juror's note was received. He clarifies the timing and details of the conversation and follow-up questions he asked.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.