Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-8415Court UnsealedDeposition

deposition: A-5819

Schoeman testifies about a conversation with Trzaskoma that occurred during jury deliberations, after a juror's note was received. He clarifies the timing and details of the conversation and follow-up questions he asked.

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: a-5819
Pages
1
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Schoeman testifies about a conversation with Trzaskoma that occurred during jury deliberations, after a juror's note was received. He clarifies the timing and details of the conversation and follow-up questions he asked.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection
0Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

court transcript: A-5745

The document is a transcript of a court proceeding where a witness, Brune, is being questioned about a conversation regarding a suspension opinion and whether certain individuals were informed about it. The witness is unsure if Ms. Edelstein asked to see the suspension opinion, but confirms that Ms. Trzaskoma informed Mr. Schoeman and Mr. Berke about the issue on May 12th.

1p
Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

court transcript: A-5823

The transcript captures the redirect examination of Mr. Schoeman, where he discusses a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1's status as a suspended attorney. The court and attorneys explore the context and significance of this conversation. The witness is then excused, and the next witness, Barry Berke, is called.

1p
Court UnsealedDepositionUnknown

deposition: A-5831

The document is a deposition transcript where Berke is being questioned about their investigation into potential juror misconduct. Berke is hesitant to speculate and provides limited information based on their personal experience. The questioning attorney, Okula, presses Berke for more definitive answers.

1p
Court UnsealedDepositionUnknown

deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-00330-PAE Document 61102/20

Ms. Edelstein is cross-examined about a conversation with colleagues regarding a suspended lawyer with the same name as Juror No. 1. She explains that they didn't bring it to the court's attention because they deemed it inconceivable that Juror No. 1 was the suspended lawyer. There was no discussion about raising a juror misconduct issue in a post-trial motion until after receiving a letter from Ms. Conrad.

1p
Court UnsealedDepositionUnknown

deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-13038

The witness, Schoeman, testifies about a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1, discussing a person with the same name who was a disbarred lawyer. Trzaskoma assured Schoeman it was not the same person based on the voir dire process. No further discussion about Juror No. 1 occurred with Trzaskoma or anyone at the Brune firm during that time.

1p
Court UnsealedOtherUnknown

Index of Examination: A-5838

This document is an index of examinations conducted during a court proceeding, listing witnesses and the attorneys who questioned them. It includes the names of witnesses Susan Brune, Laura Edelstein, Paul Schoeman, and Barry H. Berke, as well as attorneys Ms. Davis, Mr. Shechtman, and Mr. Okula. The document was prepared by Southern District Reporters, P.C.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.