deposition: A-5830
The witness, Berke, is questioned about a juror's background and potential connections to a suspended lawyer and personal injury lawsuit. Berke expresses discomfort speculating about hypothetical scenarios, but states they didn't believe the disbarred lawyer was Juror No. 1 based on available information.
Summary
The witness, Berke, is questioned about a juror's background and potential connections to a suspended lawyer and personal injury lawsuit. Berke expresses discomfort speculating about hypothetical scenarios, but states they didn't believe the disbarred lawyer was Juror No. 1 based on available information.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Related Documents (6)
Court Filing - Exhibit List: 1:20-cv-03038-PAE Document 616-1
This document is an exhibit list from a court filing in Case 1:20-cv-03038-PAE, referencing various documents from the Conrad v. Manessis case, including trial testimony, verdict, and post-trial motions. The exhibits include affirmations, affidavits, and other records related to the case. The list provides a catalog of documents submitted as evidence or used in the proceedings.
deposition transcript: 1616630
The witness testifies about representing Craig Brubaker, recalls a juror's note asking about respondeat superior, and discusses a conversation with Susan Brune about the juror.
deposition transcript: A-5793
The deponent discusses receiving a letter from Catherine Conrad and their subsequent conversation with Susan Brune about it. The letter revealed information about jury deliberations, disturbing the deponent. The deponent discussed the Appellate Division order with Susan Brune but not the Westlaw report.
Court Filing - Exhibit List: 2020-08-000086-BE-N
This document is a list of exhibits filed in a court case, including orders, affirmations, judgments, testimony excerpts, and affidavits related to Conrad v. Manessis. The exhibits cover trial proceedings, post-trial motions, and evidence. The list appears to be part of a larger court filing.
deposition transcript: A-5825
The deponent, a lawyer, testifies about representing Craig Brubaker and discusses a note from Juror No. 1, Catherine Conrad, regarding jury instructions. The deponent also recounts a conversation with opposing counsel Susan Brune about Conrad.
deposition transcript: A-5721
The deposition transcript shows Brune being questioned about their actions during a trial, specifically regarding the discovery of information about a potential juror named Catherine Conrad. Brune testifies that they did not immediately inform the court about the information and did not require anyone to explain its significance to them. The testimony highlights Brune's understanding of the potential significance of the information.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.