Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-018605House Oversight

Monogamy discussion excerpt from a personal blog

Monogamy discussion excerpt from a personal blog The passage is a personal commentary on monogamy with no mention of any influential actors, financial transactions, or misconduct. It provides no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Content is a personal opinion piece on monogamy versus polyamory.; References a blog URL but no relevant political or financial context.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-018605
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Monogamy discussion excerpt from a personal blog The passage is a personal commentary on monogamy with no mention of any influential actors, financial transactions, or misconduct. It provides no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Content is a personal opinion piece on monogamy versus polyamory.; References a blog URL but no relevant political or financial context.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightrelationshipsocial-commentaryblog

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
time I'm really serious about someone, I guess. Monogamy isn't necessary for these things, but it would definitely make doing them less complicated. + Societal acceptance. Straight up, monogamy is the Western societal default. In some ways this makes monogamy hard to understand and communicate about -- because there are SO many assumptions and built-in expectations, and folks don't always agree on those expectations! A recent study found that 40% of young couples don't agree about whether or not they're monogamous. That amazes me, because I have never assumed that I was monogamous with a partner until we had a conversation establishing that we were monogamous... but I guess I can see how it happens, if people feel anxious about communicating and fall back on assumptions instead. Usually, however, being the societal default makes monogamy easier. Heterosexual monogamous people can get married with no problem, for example, and while marriage is obviously contested territory for non-hets, it's instructive that "gay marriage” is such a big political issue (while "polyamorous marriage" is currently nothing more than a specter right-wingers use to scare people about gay marriage). Outsiders usually assume that you're monogamous when you introduce your partner. Romantic comedies exalt monogamy; the media, and many people around us, associate monogamy with love. When you're monogamous, you never have to articulate your weird relationship structure to your parents. You rarely have to think outside the box about relationship problems, and you can go to any Western advice columnist or therapist and be sure that they'll recognize your relationship as legitimate. (Those of you who like privilege checklists might enjoy this monogamous privilege checklist, which is patterned after Peggy McIntosh's classic essay and white privilege checklist.) + Some people just like it better. Occasionally, people will toy with the idea of an “orientational” element to polyamory or monogamy: some folks just plain feel aligned with monogamy or non-monogamy. (I have similar thoughts about this as I do about BDSM as a sexual orientation.) Personally, I always think it's really key, during any sex-positive critique, to emphasize from the start that whatever you like is cool as long as the actions you take are consensual. I know people who act all apologetic for being monogamous, usually because they've been overexposed to "polyvangelists" who argue that non-monogamy is "better" or "more evolved." This is silly! Liking monogamy doesn't have to be justified, as long as you don't turn around and claim that non-monogamy is bad and wrong. And liking monogamy is a perfectly awesome reason for preferring monogamy! KK Ok This can be found on the Internet at: http://clarissethorn.com/blog/2011/06/09/in-praise-of-monogamy/

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.