Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-018606House Oversight

Personal essay on polyamory and relationship dynamics

Personal essay on polyamory and relationship dynamics The passage is a personal reflection on polyamory with no mention of public officials, financial transactions, or any wrongdoing. It offers no investigative leads, novel controversy, or power linkages. Key insights: Author discusses personal experiences with multiple romantic partners.; Mentions challenges of interacting with partners' other partners.; No references to political figures, institutions, or illicit activities.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-018606
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Personal essay on polyamory and relationship dynamics The passage is a personal reflection on polyamory with no mention of public officials, financial transactions, or any wrongdoing. It offers no investigative leads, novel controversy, or power linkages. Key insights: Author discusses personal experiences with multiple romantic partners.; Mentions challenges of interacting with partners' other partners.; No references to political figures, institutions, or illicit activities.

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightpolyamoryrelationshipspersonal-essay

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
POLYAMORY: [theory] My Top Questions About Dealing With Multiple Lovers I wrote this in early 2011. The comments on the online version are especially good -- lots of viewpoints and resources shared. Sometimes my commenters just blow me away. TK OK ok My Top Questions About Dealing With Multiple Lovers I have a lot more theoretical exposure to polyamory than personal experience, but I've been gaining more personal experience over the last year. It's often interesting, sometimes painful. Some recent experiences are making me think I am not nearly as smart or as on top of my emotions as I like to believe I am. I remind myself that I have to be willing to acknowledge when I don't know what I'm thinking, but that's harder than it looks... I don't always take enough time to understand my feelings before speaking or acting. Still. Through the stupid mistakes and the understandable ones, though my own failures to be sensitive and the little heartbreaks I've sustained, I've been learning. One thing I think I've figured out is what I want: I want a number of different relationships that are ongoing, and one or two relationships that are primary, or especially committed. Ideally, in fact, I'd love to eventually have a permanent relationship with a primary polyamorous partner in which we have kids with each other, live together most of the time, etc, but are still polyamorous. That would be a while in the future, though -- for now, it's important to me to not feel as though my partners expect me to settle down or stay in one place or anything like that. It seems like any relationship I develop, even during this relatively early time in my life, could become a child-rearing relationship eventually -- like, years from now -- but if it does, I doubt I'd want to make it monogamous. I recognize that we don't always get our ideal world. In fact, we usually don't. Although polyamory is a high priority for me, it may be something I eventually compromise on, given that the majority of people in this world identify as monogamous. Keeping all that in mind, my preference for polyamory presents some challenges, and questions that I worry about. Such as: 1. What are my responsibilities towards my partners’ other partners? A lot of poly people will tell you that if you get into a relationship with, say, a married polyamorous man, then you must also expect to interact with his spouse. In other words, don't assume that your relationship means you only interact with one half of a couple. I'm totally fine with this, but on occasion I've felt like I was getting sucked into the couple's problems, or like I was expected to have no individual relationship with my partner -- that I always had to go through his primary partner. Yes, it is certainly my responsibility to communicate with my partners’ other partners and to be friendly with them. But I need to set boundaries on that too -- just dating a poly guy

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeFinancial RecordUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01279974

Unifon Residential Loan Application Tiss appecatIon is designed to ba somaieleid by the applicanfis) weh IM Lrinclerr's ensistance Apellcents should camptet • Ihn form as -Borrower or •Co-Borrower.• as ripplicablo. CO-BOVTOW er information rrust also be providid (and Ihro approprim• box checked) when L J th• income or astet s of • person oder (han the Borrower eintluden the Boasones sponse) will be used asa besä toi loan quaktkation or Ei the income or essets of the Borrower's spouse or oth

5p
House OversightUnknown

Marketing Pitch for LOCiMOBILE GPS Tracking Apps

Marketing Pitch for LOCiMOBILE GPS Tracking Apps The passage is purely promotional, containing no allegations, names, transactions, or actionable investigative leads involving any powerful actors. It offers no novel or controversial information. Key insights: LOCiMOBILE claims 850,000 installations in 106 countries.; App available for iPhone, iPod, Android, and iPad.; Marketing language about family monitoring and potential celebrity break‑ups.

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01448419

• Even if a person has been widowed several times, he or she can only use the portable exclusion from the last deceased spouse (in other words, the surviving spouse cannot accumulate multiple portable exclusions). • The portable exclusion can't be any larger than the indexed exclusion in effect at the deceased spouse's death. So that is a brief overview of portability. How can a married couple use it? Here is a possible approach: John and Abby are long-time New Yorkers who have been marr

1p
Financial RecordUnknown

Table of Contents

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01265841

45p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01389903

GLDUS132 EverWatch Financial Exhibit B FOR INDIVIDUALS INVESTOR STATUS The Investor hereby represents and warrants that the answers provided below completely and accurately describe the Investor. The Investor is a natural person whose net worth, either individually or jointly with such person's spouse, at the time of purchase, equals (exclusive of the value of the Investor's primary residence): D Less than $500,000 O $500,000 - $999,999 O $1,000,000 - $4,999,999 D $5,000,000 - $9,

1p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.