Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-018607House Oversight

Personal advice on polyamory and relationship boundaries

Personal advice on polyamory and relationship boundaries The document contains private relationship advice with no mention of public officials, financial transactions, or misconduct. It offers no actionable investigative leads and lacks any relevance to power structures or controversy. Key insights: Discusses timing for introducing polyamory in relationships; Explores responsibilities when partners overlap with friends; Considers involvement with monogamous individuals while preferring polyamory

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-018607
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Personal advice on polyamory and relationship boundaries The document contains private relationship advice with no mention of public officials, financial transactions, or misconduct. It offers no actionable investigative leads and lacks any relevance to power structures or controversy. Key insights: Discusses timing for introducing polyamory in relationships; Explores responsibilities when partners overlap with friends; Considers involvement with monogamous individuals while preferring polyamory

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightrelationshippolyamorypersonal-advice

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
does not make me their relationship therapist, and it doesn't make me best friends with his other girlfriends (or boyfriends, for that matter). I am responsible for what I do, but I'm not responsible for what he does. I am responsible for how I treat his spouse, but I can't be responsible for how he treats his spouse. But what if I'm already friends with someone, and one of my partners gets involved with that person? Do I have special responsibilities in that case? I'm still figuring that one out. 2. When is it actually the best time to start talking about polyamory and setting out relationship definitions? My approach so far has been to put poly on the table during initial conversations, and then talk about it more when the topic of the relationship comes up. But I've been thinking lately that I probably should go into more detail sooner, because people have such different stereotypes of open relationships that I can't be sure they're on board with what I'm talking about unless we've discussed polyamory in-depth. I feel like I talk to a lot of people who think they want a supposedly "polyamorous” relationship because they see it as a no-strings-attached free-for-all, and that's definitely not what I want. Or I talk to people who back away from polyamory for the same reason. I see polyamory as being about more commitment to relationship negotiation, not less. I see it as being about setting individual boundaries, if necessary -- it's not about having no boundaries. I see it as being about creating a secure situation for all parties involved -- not making anyone insecure, or ignoring anyone's needs. And being polyamorous doesn't make my relationships unimportant to me. Being in love doesn't seem at odds with polyamory for me. This is a hard thing to communicate in a small dose, though, especially if I'm dealing with someone who has minimal exposure to the concept. On the other hand, having a Serious Conversation about polyamory on the first date is a bit much. 3. Is it a good idea for me to get involved with guys who ultimately want monogamy? As I noted earlier, I might compromise to monogamy eventually, but poly is a priority for me. (Who knows, maybe I'll decide it's my ideal relationship formation again someday. This seems unlikely to me right now, but anything's possible.) But what if I get really into a guy who ultimately plans to be monogamous? Is this a bad call on my part? On the one hand, if I go on a few dates with a 28-year-old guy who doesn't want to get married until his mid-30s but definitely wants a monogamous marriage when he does... I mean, why not have a relationship? On the other hand, I may be setting myself up for heartbreak in such situations, if he basically sees our relationship as "not real” from the start. This brings me to my next point... 4. Some people see polyamory as a sign of commitment-phobia. I've made this mistake myself -- in fact, the "polyamory as commitment-phobia" stereotype is so strong that I've occasionally reversed it and wondered if my desire for it was a sign of commitment-phobia. But the fact is, my appreciation for polyamory only increased as I became more certain about what I'm seeking in a partner, and as I gained more understanding of how to negotiate that. It's come along with relationship confidence and understanding. I feel pretty okay with believing in commitment in the context of polyamory. But my

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeFinancial RecordUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01279974

Unifon Residential Loan Application Tiss appecatIon is designed to ba somaieleid by the applicanfis) weh IM Lrinclerr's ensistance Apellcents should camptet • Ihn form as -Borrower or •Co-Borrower.• as ripplicablo. CO-BOVTOW er information rrust also be providid (and Ihro approprim• box checked) when L J th• income or astet s of • person oder (han the Borrower eintluden the Boasones sponse) will be used asa besä toi loan quaktkation or Ei the income or essets of the Borrower's spouse or oth

5p
House OversightUnknown

Marketing Pitch for LOCiMOBILE GPS Tracking Apps

Marketing Pitch for LOCiMOBILE GPS Tracking Apps The passage is purely promotional, containing no allegations, names, transactions, or actionable investigative leads involving any powerful actors. It offers no novel or controversial information. Key insights: LOCiMOBILE claims 850,000 installations in 106 countries.; App available for iPhone, iPod, Android, and iPad.; Marketing language about family monitoring and potential celebrity break‑ups.

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01448419

• Even if a person has been widowed several times, he or she can only use the portable exclusion from the last deceased spouse (in other words, the surviving spouse cannot accumulate multiple portable exclusions). • The portable exclusion can't be any larger than the indexed exclusion in effect at the deceased spouse's death. So that is a brief overview of portability. How can a married couple use it? Here is a possible approach: John and Abby are long-time New Yorkers who have been marr

1p
Financial RecordUnknown

Table of Contents

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01265841

45p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01389903

GLDUS132 EverWatch Financial Exhibit B FOR INDIVIDUALS INVESTOR STATUS The Investor hereby represents and warrants that the answers provided below completely and accurately describe the Investor. The Investor is a natural person whose net worth, either individually or jointly with such person's spouse, at the time of purchase, equals (exclusive of the value of the Investor's primary residence): D Less than $500,000 O $500,000 - $999,999 O $1,000,000 - $4,999,999 D $5,000,000 - $9,

1p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.